This is a excellent course for Software architects, addressing all key areas needed in the field. Good content, definitely recommend this course for anyone aspiring to be a Software architect.
This course integrates the previous courses (Object oriented design and Design patterns) and applies the knowledge taught in those courses to real life problems. Highly recommended.
par Austin p•
There could be more session on architecturing and analysis
par Adrian A•
Good course I would definitely recommend it to my peers.
par Lorenzo C•
Useful introduction to software architecture.
par Evgeny P•
Good in general as an introductory course.
par Linwei Z•
a little bit abstract
par Elix F•
It had good things but honestly it's lacking a lot, it barely explains the material and expects you to take on tasks with barely any examples so you need to go and research in other places.
par JOSKO R•
par Gregory P•
Course content was OK but not explained thoroughly, especially the ATAM process. Assignment evaluations expect details that are not actually covered in the course. The capstone assignment grading is particularly superficial, asking only if an architecture evaluation was done, not whether it was any good. There is zero expert feedback. Since it is impossible to see the solution until after grading peers, I am forced to guess at whether responses "make sense". Most of the capstone assignments I reviewed were plagiarized, but there is no incentive to report it because you can't complete the course until you have 3 completed reviews, and reporting plagiarism does not count as a review.
par Tulay M•
Someone reading a text in a fast, monotone way for the entire course does not fit my learning style. The only thing I liked was the peer review assignments. That's what I learned the most: from other's mistakes and grading questions.
par Ali H A•
The course wasn't providing practical knowledge or the know-how. It seemed to be just bullet-points and someone is talking about them in general.
par Norbert M•
par Muneer S•
Expectation was not fulfilled. Just overview on so many theories and unrelated assignment at the end of the course. That too rated by another peer who can rate it like a robot using the pre-defined answer patterns. It would be good if the assignment are corrected by the instructor or at-least there is a way to directly get feedback from instructor.
par Manuel H•
The peer review concept and sharing app makes every course useless
par Deleted A•
The peer-review system makes this course unbearably slow
par Alvaro A Z G•
Excelent course, has all the topics I needed
par Medet T•
Курс был очень полезно !!!!
par Julia M•
par Жеңіс К•
par TANVIRUL I 1•
par Israt J S 1•
par SR S•
par Md. F R 1•
par SAWVIK R A 1•
par Diego A H M•
me gusto mucho la sección de estilos arquitectónicos y diagrama de componentes, no fue claro la parte de atributos de calidad y Metodo ATAM , para análisis de disemio
par Refat A R - 2•