I had seen git before, but I am still at the very beginning. If I hadn't seen it before, the course would be much harder. I guess the course should have introduced some more basics concepts/details. Many time it was not clear what the presenter was trying to solve. Maybe a problem/solution approach would improve the course.

You'll learn about git and git hub but I feel it shouldn't take 4 "weeks" to learn the material. A lot of time in the videos is wasted. Google Python animation, reiterating what we've learned, congratulating us for watching... We only need a few minutes of video and the rest would be better as an interactive web experience.

1​. course doesn't have much examples, especially in the introduction part, had to depend on other courses to understand better.

2​. too much video time with talking, not much graphics to visualize whats happening in the repos

Hello Mr/Mrs

My linux system is blocked, because I made a test of Git/Github by connecting to one of your remote machines and I forgot to disconnect. Currently the machine is in emergency mode, how can I fix this situation?

As learners without backgroud in this field, we need explinations with exemples in parallel. Explinations without exmples are less interesting for a technical discipline like " Introduction to Git and Github.

There were some basic items that I think the course should have covered. Ex. what is HEAD? I expect this to be covered here even though I understand some items are left to the student.

Good overview of Version Control other associated concepts and how to use them in your code development. VC is an essential part to any software project.

covered a lot of ground. Could have been clearer if it made use of illustrations to show where and the pushes and pulls were going.

A very basic one, in my particular case completely skipable one, but i undestand is posibly necesary to another people

L​abs too weak, do not entirely cover the presented topics. Exercises in the presentation not available for practice.

The final project of the last week is not graded and appropriate. Expected a better version.

The course should include more graphic and diagram that demonstrates how things is going.

I think need more examples to understand more.

Needs a better practical component to it

nice course bit time consuming

It's getting more difficult

Its a good jounery...

nice

cool

The Course Content was basic but informative. The pushy attempts of the instructor trying continuously to be humorous is nothing but a letdown!

Other than that, it would have been very useful if some more time was invested in preparation of the course to provide for slides on the screen with important bullet points, workflows, guidelines etc. instead of showing the instructors face the whole time(no offense meant here), which in my opinion makes it much easier and faster to grasp the concepts, instead of listening and rewinding the videos repeatedly.

But still all in all, a good course to grasp the Git Basics.

Honestly, first two weeks were great. After that, it all went like rocket science. I had to watch week3 twice, some of the videos thrice to understand whatis going on. While designing the course, also keep in mind that not all the people are coming after finishing first two courses of the specialization. Videos of week 3 and 4 seemed like revision courses.

Week 3 and 4 should be updated on the labs, otherwise this was a good course. Easy to work through.

dfgsfsfsfasrgarsg sfsgssfsfs sfsfsdfssdfssd

The course autocompleted my labs section

ok