Créé par :   Université du Michigan

  • George Siedel

    Enseigné par :    George Siedel, Williamson Family Professor of Business Administration and Thurnau Professor of Business Law

Engagement8,5 heures de vidéos
Langue
English, Sous-titres : Ukrainian, Chinese (Simplified), Portuguese (Brazilian), Russian, Spanish
Comment réussirRéussissez tous les devoirs notés pour terminer le cours.
Notes des utilisateurs
4.7 stars
Average User Rating 4.7Voir ce que disent les étudiants
Programme de cours

FAQ
Comment cela fonctionne
Travail en cours
Travail en cours

Chaque cours fonctionne comme un manuel interactif en proposant des vidéos préenregistrées, des quiz et des projets.

Aide de la part de vos pairs
Aide de la part de vos pairs

Connectez-vous à des milliers d'autres étudiants et débattez sur des idées, discutez le contenu du cours et obtenez de l'aide pour en maîtriser les concepts.

Certificats
Certificats

Obtenez une reconnaissance officielle pour votre travail et partagez votre réussite avec vos amis, vos collègues et vos employeurs.

Créateurs
Université du Michigan
The mission of the University of Michigan is to serve the people of Michigan and the world through preeminence in creating, communicating, preserving and applying knowledge, art, and academic values, and in developing leaders and citizens who will challenge the present and enrich the future.
Notation et examens
Note moyenne 4.7 sur 5 sur 3,409 notes

very helpful framework about conducting negotiations. the BATNA model is easy to remember and easy to apply. a model that will stay with me forever

Fire! Thanks!

course content was extremely good but week 7 exam was not up to the mark. I attempted the exam twice to came to know that "two of the above" means first and 2nd option not 3rd and last option. Also, some of the questions were very confused hard to understand. Test needs very much betterment

This course was extremely valuable to me. Theoretical knowledge especially. My two points for possible improvement, most probably subjective, would be:

1.The course is too slow-paced. There is a bit too much of an auxiliary talk, which may distract from the essential knowledge.

2.While the course offers some state of the art practical examples, a little more interactive approach would probably immensely increase student involvement and hence help keep attention and distinguish important points.

Lastly, at every start of the week, I was asked to do a test quiz to asses my knowledge from that week. This is very strange. The test quizzes should most definitely be offered only in the end of a week, AFTER I have acquired knowledge, and not before.