À propos de ce cours : We will introduce methods to perform systematic reviews and meta-analysis of clinical trials. We will cover how to formulate an answerable research question, define inclusion and exclusion criteria, search for the evidence, extract data, assess the risk of bias in clinical trials, and perform a meta-analysis. Upon successfully completing this course, participants will be able to: - Describe the steps in conducting a systematic review - Develop an answerable question using the “Participants Interventions Comparisons Outcomes” (PICO) framework - Describe the process used to collect and extract data from reports of clinical trials - Describe methods to critically assess the risk of bias of clinical trials - Describe and interpret the results of meta-analyses
Enseigné par : Tianjing Li, MD, MHS, PHD, Assistant Professor, Epidemiology
Bloomberg School of Public HealthEnseigné par : Kay Dickersin, PhD, Professor, Epidemiology
Bloomberg School of Public Health
| Engagement | 6 weeks of study, 4-6 hours/week |
| Langue | English |
| Comment réussir | Réussissez tous les devoirs notés pour terminer le cours. |
| Notes des utilisateurs |
- Reading: Syllabus
- Reading: Pre Course Survey
- Reading: From the Field Videos
- Vidéo: Lecture 1A : Introduction to Systematic Reviews
- Vidéo: Lecture 1B: Introduction to Meta-Analysis
- Vidéo: Lecture 1C: Producers and Users of Systematic Reviews
- Vidéo: Hannah Rothstein, PhD
- Vidéo: Lecture 2B: Deciding the Type and Scope of Your Question
- Vidéo: Lecture 2C: Elements of the Question
- Vidéo: Lecture 2D: Refining the Question
- Vidéo: Lecture 2E: Some Examples
- Vidéo: Lecture 2F: Analytic Frameworks
- Vidéo: Betsy Becker, PhD
- Reading: Welcome to the first Peer Assignment!
- Vidéo: Lecture 3A: Finding the Evidence: Searching Principles
- Vidéo: Lecture 3B: Identifying Key Sources and Techniques for Searching
- Vidéo: Lecture 3C: Building a High-Quality Search Strategy
- Vidéo: Lecture 3D: Documenting Your Search and Conclusions
- Vidéo: Lecture 4A: Why Bias in the Individual Study is Important to a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Vidéo: Lecture 4B: Selection Bias
- Vidéo: Lecture 4C: Information Bias
- Vidéo: Lecture 4D: Bias in the Analysis
- Vidéo: Lecture 4E: Displaying Study "Quality" in Your Systematic Review
- Vidéo: Byron Wallace, Phd
- Vidéo: Lecture 5B: Selection Bias
- Vidéo: Lecture 5C: Information Bias
- Vidéo: Lecture 5D: Bias in the Analysis
- Vidéo: Lecture 5E: Reporting Transparently
- Vidéo: Lecture 6A: Qualitative Synthesis and Interpreting Results Section A
- Vidéo: Lecture 6B: What is Qualitative Synthesis
- Vidéo: Lecture 6C: Some Examples
- Vidéo: Christopher Schmid, PhD
- Vidéo: Lecture 7A: Planning Your Meta-Analysis Section A
- Vidéo: Lecture 7B: Introduction to Meta-Analysis
- Vidéo: Lecture 7C: Why Do a Meta-Analysis?
- Vidéo: Lecture 7D: Types of Data and Effect Measures
- Vidéo: Lecture 8A: Fixed Effect Model
- Vidéo: Lecture 8B: Random Effects Model
- Vidéo: Lecture 8C: Random Effects Model
- Vidéo: Michael Borenstein, PhD
- Reading: Welcome to Your Final Peer Review Assignment
- Vidéo: Closing Remarks
Each course is like an interactive textbook, featuring pre-recorded videos, quizzes and projects.
Connect with thousands of other learners and debate ideas, discuss course material, and get help mastering concepts.
Earn official recognition for your work, and share your success with friends, colleagues, and employers.
the course was very professional, yet simple to understand and perfect for beginners and intermediate level researchers. it provided valuable sources for further readings and the peer review assignments, I think should be more than two, because I learn what I learn by applying it carefully for an exam.
thank you for putting this much of an effort to provide this amazing course
Brilliant course .
I loved everything about this course! I learned a lot and I am proud to say that now I can critically read a systematic review and interpret meta-analysis results. I will definitely do another Johns Hopkins course in the future!
XZ
Overall good course. You can have view all the basic about systematic review in the field of medicine and public health.
Two short shortcomings in my view: 1. Based on clinical medicine, people in other field may take some time to get through; 2. English subtitle some mistakes, like "now" as "null".