Perhaps one of the biggest preventative measures a company can implement to prevent employees from engaging in corruption or allowing corruption to occur is to eliminate the incentives to pay bribes. So, first, by inculcating the proper Culture of Compliance throughout the entire workforce, incentives to pay bribes will become antithetical to the manner in which the company conducts its business. So, we've talked a lot about the importance of instilling the proper ethical behavior at a company. So, there's no need to really repeat all of that. But the general concept of creating the right environment, where employees would not even consider paying an illegal quid pro quo or even allowing a third party to do the same, is extremely important when it comes to anti-corruption efforts. A company needs to have a culture where it's clear from the start that the company will not tolerate any employee or third party acting on behalf of the company to engage in any illegal or unethical business practice. Second, you want to make sure that there are no financial incentives to pay a bribe. If an employee or a third party receives a success fee, or there otherwise compensated based on a percentage of the transaction, then they may be incentivized to make an illegal payment. Say for example, that you are a sales manager at a company that makes farm equipment. You have an abundance of inventory, and you want to try to sell it in previously untapped countries. In fact, you heard that the government of an African country may be interested in buying farm equipment. The problem is that, you have no contacts with any government officials in this country. Now, suppose you learn that there is someone who is well connected with that country's Minister of agriculture. You'll find out who it is, you run a background check on that person, and it doesn't reveal any negative information. So, you want to engage them to introduce your company to the Minister of Agriculture and assist in potentially selling your tractors and other farm equipment. So, you propose a contract with a third party. You have two choices, you can pay them a flat fee for their services, say a $100,000, or you can give them a percentage of a signed purchase agreement, say one percent of a $10 million sale, which is also a $100,000. But they'll receive nothing unless the agreement is completed. Under the first scenario, the agent receives a fee regardless of the outcome. Under the second scenario, the agent receives a fee only if the Ministry of Agriculture actually buys the farm equipment. So, the second scenario creates a situation where the agent or an employee who is compensated in a similar manner is potentially incentivized to pay a bribe to one or several government officials who can make the decision to buy the farm equipment. There are of course business reasons for utilizing success and contingency fee arrangements. And to be clear, they don't always result in corrupt payments. But these are arrangements that are often abused and they're fertile ground for problems to take root. The company must carefully consider the risks involved in each situation, and implement measures and controls to avoid problems from developing.