Explore
For Enterprise
Join for Free
Log In

Arts et humanités
Business
Informatique
Science des données
Technologies de l'information
santé
Mathématiques et logique
Développement personnel
Sciences physiques et ingénierie
Sciences sociales
Apprentissage des langues
Diplômes
Certificats

Explorez l'intégralité de Coursera

Parcourir
Rechercher
For Enterprise
Connexion
Inscrivez-vous gratuitement

Week 2 Lecture

Loading...

The Factors that Influence the Effectiveness of Boards and the Governance Process

Université d'État de New York

4.6 (36 notes) | 3.1K étudiants inscrits

Cours 3 de 4 dans Améliorer le leadership et la gouvernance des associations à but non lucratif Spécialisation

The third course in this Specialization introduces you to the factors that influence how effective boards of directors will be in carrying out their roles and responsibilities and hence the impact they have in shaping the success of the organization they govern. While this course has been developed with North American culture in mind, we do appreciate that, in other parts of the world, the nature of the factors that influence the effectiveness of nonprofit boards of directors may vary. Nevertheless,it is our hope that much of the course content will still be of value to those in other parts of the world. To learn more about this course, please watch the overview video by copying and pasting the following link into your web browser: https://goo.gl/aAMIfl. Keywords: Nonprofit; Nonprofit Sector; Voluntary Sector; Nonprofit Organizations, Non-Governmental Organizations, Volunteer Organizations, Leadership, Management, Governance, Board, Board of Directors, Performance, Effectiveness Course 3 Overview: Week 1: This week's questions: What factors influence the effectiveness of board meetings? What are the formal procedures and structures within the board that impact its performance? What can a board do to intentionally improve the way it structures itself and runs its decision making meetings? Week 2: This week's questions: What do we mean by board composition and development and why is it important? Why is it difficult to change the composition of the board? How do you design the ideal mix of board members? How do you locate, recruit and develop board members? Week 3: This week's questions: What do we mean by the "culture" of the board and why is it important? How do boards develop and pass along culture? Can board cultures be intentionally changed? What is the role of leadership in shaping board culture? What do effective nonprofit leaders involved in governance do? How can leadership be managed for higher performance? Week 4: At this stage, you are asked to review the course content, submit a written assignment (known lightheartedly as a BEAR (Board Effectiveness Readiness Assessment), and take two multiple choice Readiness Assurance Tests (known similarly as RATs). One RAT will assess knowledge and reading comprehension and the other will test application of knowledge within a practical case. Week 5: We will encourage you to discuss the RATs in the discussion forums and take them again should you wish to change any of your answers based on the information exchanged.

Visualiser le programme de cours

Avis

4.6 (36 notes)

5 stars
26 ratings
4 stars
6 ratings
3 stars
4 ratings

À partir de la leçon

The Composition and Development of the Board

Hello and welcome to Week 2 of the third course on Improving Leadership and Governance in Nonprofit Organizations! The focus this week is on one of the most difficult challenges to board performance--creating the ideal mix of board members and training them so that they can be as effective as possible. Some of the key questions we will explore this week are: What do we mean by board composition and development and why is it important? Why is it difficult to change the composition of the board? How do you design the ideal mix of board members? How do you locate and recruit the best new board members? What are the best ways to orient and develop board members? Is your board socially and functionally inclusive? These two influences form the basis of the video lecture, special guest interview, and content in Chapter 8 of the SUNY Open Textbook, Guidelines for Improving the Effectiveness of Boards of Directors of Nonprofit Organizations. We look forward to helping you learn about another factor that may influence the leadership and governance of nonprofit organizations this week!

Week 2 Lecture24:23

Week 2 Guest Interview with Pat Bradshaw on Board Diversity22:45

Enseigné par

Prof. Yvonne D. Harrison, PhD
Associate Professor and Director
Prof. Vic Murray, PhD
Adjunct Professor

Transcription

[MUSIC]

Hello again.

Professor Vic Murray here, and

welcome to week two of the third course in the Coursera specialization,

improving leadership and governance in non-profit organizations.

This course focuses on factors that impact the ability of the board of

directors to carry out its role and responsibilities effectively.

Last week professor Harrison covered the important topics of board structure,

operating procedures, and meeting leadership.

This week the focus is on one of the most difficult challenges to board performance.

Creating the ideal mix of board members and

providing them with the training to make them as effective as possible.

So here are the questions that this short lecture will address.

First, let's be clear, what do we mean by board composition and

development, and why is it important?

Secondly, why is it difficult to change the composition of the board?

As we'll see, it is, for many quite difficult, but why is that?

Thirdly, how do you design the ideal mix of board members?

Fourth, if you have an ideal mix in mind, how do you locate and

recruit these people?

The best people you need for the organization, for the board.

Fifth, when you've got them, what are the best ways to orient and

develop both new members and existing members of the board?

And finally as always, a few questions to inform your peer to peer discussions.

So lets start by addressing the question of what we actually mean by board

composition and why it is important for people like us, researchers, consultants,

and board members to understand the nature of board composition.

Simply put, word composition refers to the characteristics of

the individuals who comprise the membership of the board.

Now, there are many characteristics that people bring with them when they

come onto a board.

They have different personalities.

Those personalities are shaped by background characteristics that they have.

Male, female, old, young, having different cultural backgrounds,

ethnic or racial backgrounds, plus they have their education that can differ,

their socio economic status, their work experience.

They have different kinds and amounts of connections that may or may not be useful.

So there's so many ways in which the mix of characteristics that

people bring to the board can be important and have an impact on how the board works.

Now getting the right mix of people on the board is important because

if it's not matched to demands of the critical issues facing the organization,

it can negatively affect the way the organization performs.

As we'll see, the best board is the board that's ideally matched

to the situations in which it and its organization exist.

Not only does this mix affect the organizations performance though,

boards that don't reflect the communities in which the organization exist,

those they served, those who provide resources, those who are allies and

partners potentially.

Not reflecting those communities can damage those

communities by getting out of touch with their needs and resources.

As you may know by now, for the past, six years or so, Professor Yvonne Harrison and

myself have been studying how board members themselves and

those who relate to boards perceive the board's problems and functions.

We've been using the board checkup instrument that some of you have been

using and probably know by now.

And one of the interesting findings from that research is that many boards

perceive that the mix of people on the board could be

better suited to the needs of the organization.

But they also say, it's very difficult to find and recruit these kinds of people.

So that is a real problem it's a dilemma.

Why is it that this occurs?

Well there are several reasons.

Some of them are external to the organization.

Perhaps just a shortage of available people,

but some of them are internal to the board itself too and

they could be called structural reasons for a failure to change.

For example, there are a number of non-profits still today that have

in their bylaws and constitutions no fixed terms of office.

Most by now do usually have some kind of a clause that says a board member will be

appointed for a term of one, two or three years, and that term might be renewed

twice or three times, after which they're expected to step off the board.

And that automatically does bring an opportunity for change.

If there are no fixed terms, yeah, boards can still change, but

it can be a slow process and

it becomes much easier to recruit people just like the ones who have stepped away.

Another structural problem is that when it comes to finding board members,

there is no actual process or a structure for doing it.

One comes up to the annual meeting and about a month or

two before someone says my God, we need two new board members.

Who knows somebody?

So there's no responsibility for oversight such as a governance committee.

A governance committee, which in the past was often known as a nominating committee,

is the body that's responsible for trying to identify and

recruit the best possible board members.

Without one it becomes much more haphazard.

And with that of course having a committee per say isn't really quite enough.

There needs to be a systematic process for identifying and

recruiting the best people.

Another reason for a failure to change though is not so much structural or

procedural as just the board's informal taken for granted,

unspoken culture in which the shared understanding is,

well, the best people to get on the board are people like us.

We've done good job, so let's search among our friends and

contacts and colleagues and we'll find some people like us.

That definitely does make it a problem to find the right mix.

Okay, so how does a board that feels the need for

a change in its makeup actually go about doing that?

Or maybe more commonly how does a board that has some vacancies to

fill go about finding the best people to Put in them.

First of all, we have to understand that there is no universal ideal mix of

board members for all nonprofit boards at all times in all situations.

There's only an ideal mix for a given organization,

a given board at a given time, facing a given set of circumstances.

However, there are a few basic minimum qualifications that

are desirable in all board members and here are three of them.

There may be more, but in our experience,

these three are really important to try to find in whoever you bring onto the board.

And they are kind of obvious.

The person really should believe in the mission of the organization and

feel a commitment to achieving that mission on a personal level.

Secondly, they should be willing to contribute the time and effort.

It isn't really good enough to say, yes, yes, you do good work and

I'll happily sit there but I don't actually have much time to devote to it.

Thirdly, and this is wonderful if it can be achieved.

It's someone that you can ascertain is able to see the big picture,

and what is best for the organization as a whole.

They won't necessarily come with a predetermined agenda or

the feeling that they only represent one

constituency that it's their job to speak for.

Okay, so how should a board go about actually deciding on

the kind of people they need in future members of the board?

And here we recommend that

the board creates something like what we have in our book,

improving the effectiveness of boards of directors of nonprofit organizations.

We call it a recruitment grid.

And it's on page 51 of the book.

And here, the main component of this is the identification of

the criteria that will be used to screen potential board members.

These are the attributes, characteristics, and

skills of potential members and existing members.

And the procedure is to identify the criteria,

look at one's existing board members, and see how well they fit the criteria.

Identify the gaps that aren't covered by existing members and

use that information in the search for new members.

What do I mean by criteria?

We identify three different sets of criteria in the sample board

recruitment grid we offer in the book.

And they refer to such things as connections with important

stakeholders that the organization deals with.

People such as clients, or users, funders,

actual or potential partners, governments and other regulators, community leaders,

business leaders, and others that might be important for your organization.

Another set of criteria have to do with useful skills and

experience that can be brought into the board by potential new members.

Experience and understanding of things like fundraising, strategic planning,

leadership, finance and accounting, marketing, etc.

Also in the chapter I might add, we do discuss

the importance of not picking people who

will be able to duplicate what management already possesses in the way of skills.

But be able to use their backgrounds in strategic thinking and

direction at the big picture level.

We also mention there demographic representation.

That it may be important for your organization to have in its support,

that give it balance on the basis of things like gender.

Geographic location may be important for your organization, age distribution,

ethno-racial backgrounds, socio-economic status backgrounds.

All those are potentially important.

And I do urge you, on this matter of diversity of backgrounds,

to watch the video that goes with this section that has to do with my

interview with Pat Bradshaw.

So once one gets those gaps identified, then this is the first big step for

getting the ideal mix of people on the board.

Now let's look at how one actually goes about locating and

then recruiting new board members.

Here are five basic steps.

First of all, let's assume there is a Governance Committee of the board,

or if there isn't, think very carefully about creating one.

Governance Committee, as we said before,

used to be called in some organizations a nominating committee.

Governance simply extends,

expands its areas of responsibility to include training and

orientation of board members and tracking how well the board's performing.

So let's assume it exists.

It needs to then establish the recruitment needs using a recruitment grid,

such as we just described in the previous PowerPoint slide.

And let me add that this should be done well in advance of the actual

process of finding the people and getting them to agree to stand for the board.

Unfortunately, too often this happens about a month before the annual meeting

at which board vacancies will be filled.

Then there's a bit of a panic ensues.

Best of all is if these recruitment needs and the whole process starts, well,

it could even be as much as a year before the new members are actually needed.

This committee, having identified the gaps needing to be filled,

needs to then widely broadcast a call for nominations.

This means more than simply going to the rest of the board and

saying, hey, folks, give us some names of people who might come on the board.

It means going to all sorts of other people who might have contacts and

knowledge of potential candidates,

such as members of the management team, client groups, funders,

others in the stakeholder groups surrounding the organization.

And they need to be informed of the qualifications being sought and

how the process will proceed.

Assume they come up with a whole bunch of names.

First pass at these may reduce them somewhat.

But then there comes to be another step which is to ask those nominators to

provide some information on how well they fill the gaps in the recruitment grid.

And maybe some background,

further background information on the potential nominee.

Then it's the job of the Governance Committee to assess the suitability of

these nominees and create a ranked shortlist of prospective candidates.

That is easier said than done.

It's not easy When going for board members,

it's not the same process as trying to fill positions in the staff where you can.

It's very well known that references will be checked and

background will be looked into.

Here it has to be done a little more subtlety sometimes.

But nevertheless, the committee should be trying to

assess just how suitable they really are, these potential nominees.

Once that short list is created, then each person on the list should be approached.

And the best approach should be through the board

chair who has the position, the dignity,

the prestige of that position to bring to the discussion

with the nominee how much they might be willing to sit on the board.

Okay now, let's assume that your recruitment process has been a success and

you have a fine, upstanding group of new board members coming on.

The next most important step is to make sure they become effective as quickly as

possible.

What does that really involve?

It's called the orientation process, and it's got at least three major components.

One is to provide them in advance, well before their first meeting,

with an up-to-date board manual covering basic information on the organization and

the operation of the board.

This can also be augmented by things like the minutes of previous meetings,

so they get a sense of what the most recent business is that

the board's been dealing with.

And then there needs to be some kind of formal orientation session.

This would be the case whether it's only one person coming on or

several, three or four.

Formal in the sense that it is scheduled, it's got a time

allocation, and it's going to be with the most important people in the organization,

such as the executive director and the board chair.

In which they will be given a full background

exposure to what the board does, a tour probably of the organization,

a meeting with other key people, and things of that sort.

It needs to be planned and systematic.

And then once they start attending board meetings,

it's a big help if there can be a buddy system.

Or more formally a mentor designated to take the new board member under his or

her wing for the first year or so.

And meet with them on occasion,

have a coffee to discuss how they perceive the meetings they've been attending.

And to give them, again, background and

helpful other information to help them get up to speed for the board.

That's all for new board members that needs to be done.

But it's not wise to assume that the existing board members

don't need any further development either.

We've found in our research and consulting practices that when one

interviews individuals on the board, or gives them a survey to complete,

such as the one you're familiar with that we use at boardcheckup.com.

They can identify areas in which a significant number

of them feel the need for more training.

It will become apparent that they are not comfortable with understanding

the financial systems used by the organization or the way funds are raised.

Or they don't really quite get it about strategic planning.

So these identify crucial areas where individuals need further development.

And if there's enough of them, it could be the board as a whole that needs it.

Also, some organizations have found it useful to have individual

board members carry out their own self-assessment of their own performance

in which they identify areas where they believe they need more development.

It's pretty interesting how people can be honest if given the chance

to say yes, I believe I made these contributions.

I've done well here, but I'm not so

comfortable with what I've been able to do in this other area.

And if those kind of gaps can be identified, it again becomes

quite possible for the board to develop additional sessions or information,

things to read, etc., to help these individuals get up to speed.

Just to give you an example of an individual board self-assessment form, we

have added one to the wiki page for this session, and you might find it useful.

So that's it for the content of this session on how to improve board

composition and develop the board's skills and abilities.

Let's wind up as we usually do with a few discussion questions

that I think you might find interesting in exchanging views on.

For example, how about this paradox that comes out of our research in

which we find many board members and others connected to boards perceive

that there needs to be an improvement in the mix of people on the board.

But then when we look at them a year or two later, and ask, so

what kinds of changes have you been making in the way your board works?

We find that changing the mix is one of the least changed.

It's obviously difficult for organizations and boards to do this.

So the question is, why is this?

Why is it so difficult to overcome this willingness to change and

actually make it happen?

Another interesting question is the one that comes out of

the interview with Pat Bradshaw on board diversity.

Where she has been tracking this, the extent of diversity on nonprofit

boards in North America, for quite a few years now.

And discovers that there has been a growing number of representation

of women on boards.

Not so much, however, in the way of representation

by ethnicity, race, or socioeconomic status, for that matter.

Is this important, and why might this be

that this latter kind of diversity seems so difficult to achieve?

And what specifically could be done to improve it?

Finally, how can boards make sure their candidates for

membership are doers and not just people with good-looking credentials?

It unfortunately is the case that we pick potential new members on

the basis of some paper qualifications.

And we don't really manage to find out whether they are actually

going to be willing to act and be doers,

not just representations of the law or marketing or public relations.

How can boards make sure they get doers?

So that's it.

Thanks for listening, and I hope you find this useful.

Explorer notre catalogue

Rejoignez-nous gratuitement et obtenez des recommendations, des mises à jour et des offres personnalisées.

Coursera propose un accès universel à la meilleure formation au monde, en partenariat avec des universités et des organisations du plus haut niveau, pour proposer des cours en ligne.

© 2019 Coursera Inc. Tous droits réservés.

Télécharger dans l'App Store

Disponible sur Google Play

Coursera
À propos
Direction
Carrières
Catalogue
Certificats
Certificats MasterTrack™
Diplômes
For Enterprise
For Government

Communauté
Learners
Partners
Developers
Beta Testers
Translators

Se connecter
Blog
Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter
Instagram
YouTube
Blog Tech

Plus
Conditions
Confidentialité
Aide
Accessibilité
Presse
Contact
Répertoire
Filiales