[MUSIC] Our methodology allows us to compute the export potential indicator for all the product that we have in our list, all exporters, and markets. Once it is done, we select the product that we actually want to use for export projects based on the significance or relevance of these products. So for instance, at world level, we will require that the export potential indicator corresponds to at least $200,000 that could be exported to the world. And for an individual market, we want that the potential be at least $10,000. If it is less than that, we consider that it's very unlikely, that it's not worth having an export promotion activity for that particular product in this market. For very small countries, actually this $200,000 or $10,000 value could be already difficult to reach. So then if it is the case, we also have a second criterion that says that if the product is within the top 95% cumulative EPI starting from the largest products, then we decide to keep them anyway, even if they are lower than the threshold. Once also all this competition has been done, knowing that what we compute is value, is a dollar value of potential, it's extremely easy to aggregate these results at broader levels. So initially, we have results for detailed exporter, product, and markets, but we can compute them for broader sectors. For exporting regions, importing markets, importing regions and it can also be done for the world market. And so to do that, we just add up all the values that we have at detailed level to reach these aggregation levels. For the degree of unused potential, we will compute, add all the unused potentials and divide it by the total potential to compute the aggregated level of unused potential. In our online tool that presents results of the export potential indicator, we have actually adopted a slightly different decomposition of the results, to make it simpler to use and simpler to understand for most users. So the principle is the same except that the grouping of indicators is slightly different. So what we compute on the supply side is the expected market share at world level of this particular country for a product. Then we have, on the demand side, expected total demand, and we still have the same market access indicator. And in between what we have is the easiness to trade from country i, so from exporter i, to market j. So the market share is now based on the current market share, and we still use the growth of the off year that we explained before. We also have the growth of the exporter relative to the world, the expected growth of the exporter relative to world. And finally, the global tariff conditions as before, and this corresponds to the length of the line that is presented in the graphs, analytical graphs presenting EPI in the tool. For demand, we have total imports instead of the share in total imports of a product. And then, we still have the growth of this share and the growth of the GDP of the importer is in the demand side. Tariff conditions are unchanged as compared to what we presented before. These total demand indicators correspond to the side of the bubble in the analytical graphs. And finally, the easiness to trade is a little similar to what we had before, but we still have the bilateral trade in the numerator of the fraction. But the denominator has been slightly modified to account for this change in the decomposition. And this easiness to trade between country i and j is represented by the width of the line in the analytical graph. [MUSIC]