Explore
For Enterprise
Join for Free
Log In

Arts et humanités
Business
Informatique
Science des données
Technologies de l'information
santé
Mathématiques et logique
Développement personnel
Sciences physiques et ingénierie
Sciences sociales
Apprentissage des langues
Diplômes
Certificats

Explorez l'intégralité de Coursera

Parcourir
Rechercher
For Enterprise
Connexion
Inscrivez-vous gratuitement

4.1.3 Text Message Surveys

Loading...

Data Collection: Online, Telephone and Face-to-face

Université du Michigan

4.5 (162 notes) | 6.3K étudiants inscrits

Cours 1 de 7 dans Survey Data Collection and Analytics Spécialisation

This course presents research conducted to increase our understanding of how data collection decisions affect survey errors. This is not a “how–to-do-it” course on data collection, but instead reviews the literature on survey design decisions and data quality in order to sensitize learners to how alternative survey designs might impact the data obtained from those surveys. The course reviews a range of survey data collection methods that are both interview-based (face-to-face and telephone) and self-administered (paper questionnaires that are mailed and those that are implemented online, i.e. as web surveys). Mixed mode designs are also covered as well as several hybrid modes for collecting sensitive information e.g., self-administering the sensitive questions in what is otherwise a face-to-face interview. The course also covers newer methods such as mobile web and SMS (text message) interviews, and examines alternative data sources such as social media. It concentrates on the impact these techniques have on the quality of survey data, including error from measurement, nonresponse, and coverage, and assesses the tradeoffs between these error sources when researchers choose a mode or survey design.

Visualiser le programme de cours

Avis

4.5 (162 notes)

5 stars
106 ratings
4 stars
43 ratings
3 stars
10 ratings
2 stars
1 ratings
1 star
2 ratings

EW

Mar 28, 2019

Very good summary of the advantages and disadvantages of different approaches to survey data collection, including some useful context about hybrid approaches.

CP

Mar 29, 2017

The course material presents the traditional methods and latest developments in data collection for survey research. Excellent overall.

À partir de la leçon

Module 4: Emerging modes, new data sources

In this lesson, we focus on some new data collection modes such as mobile web surveys and SMS text interviews, as well as alternative data sources such as sensor data, administrative data, and social media. By the end of this lesson, you will have a sense of the issues to which survey methodologists and survey researchers are devoting much of their attention these days. You will be able to weigh the pros and cons of these new methods and data sources.

4.1.1 New Modes, New Data15:47

4.1.2 Mobile Web Surveys19:43

4.1.3 Text Message Surveys11:00

4.1.4 Text vs. Voice Interviews15:57

Enseigné par

Frederick Conrad, Ph.D.
Research Professor, Survey Methodology

Transcription

Welcome back.

We're continuing with our discussion of mobile data collection.

We've talked about mobile web surveys ,and we'll

now shift to a discussion of text message surveys, using texting or

SMS to collect data, not just to invite or contact participants.

So the first thing to really think about is that texting is ubiquitous.

It's the primary method of daily communication in many parts of the world.

Even the most basic mobile phones support texting.

Billions of text messages are sent each month in the US and

billions more globally, so it's at least worth exploring as a survey mode.

As we've discussed for recruiting or contacting participants into

data collection and other modes like web, including mobile web and telephone, but

our focus now is on texting as a data collection mode, as an interview mode.

So what do we mean by texting,

because it's possible to interpret the term differently?

Sending and receiving character-based messages limited to 160

characters in SMS, or short messaging service,

or in Internet-based app the number of characters is unlimited.

Both of those are within scope for the current purposes.

These text messages are created either with an alphanumeric keyboard or

keypad which generally requires pressing the same

key multiple times to produce different letters.

Versus virtual alphabetic keypads, which are more common on smartphones,

so they're on-screen keypads with all alphabetic characters available.

The messages are either displayed individually or

they're threaded in the case of smartphones.

So when they're threaded, the entire kind of history, the conversational history,

is visible.

When just individual messages are available

in older cell phones, it's harder to reconstruct the history.

And the arrival of a message generally alerts the user via a tone or

a vibration or some kind of visual notification that the message has arrived.

It kind of grabs their attention.

This is one of the potential advantages of texting for survey data collection,

is that even when one isn't particularly thinking about being a survey participant,

the arrival of a message may well grab the respondent's attention.

And then finally, texting may require the sender and

recipient to subscribe to a service, such as WhatsApp.

But because texting is native to virtually every mobile phone,

much text communication can occur without any subscription services involved.

This table kind of lays out the attributes of

texting in comparison to the attributes of voice communication.

So if we think about survey data collection,

this would be telephone surveys, telephone interviews, versus text-based interviews.

But really, these features apply to these media in general.

And I won't go through the entire table,

I'll just mention a few of the features in the table.

So the first is synchrony.

So the idea is that voice is fully synchronous.

That is, when a speaker asks, say,

a question or produces some speech, it's really expected that

the listener will produce some speech almost immediately, often within a second.

With texting, it's much less synchronous.

While there can be that kind of rapid back and forth communication in texting,

quite common for the response to be sent when the user has a moment,

has time, when it's convenient.

There just isn't the same expectation for

an immediate response in text that there is in voice.

Another feature that differs between voice and text is the conversational structure.

So spoken communication occurs turn by turn.

That is, that one person speaks, and

then the person who was the listener becomes the speaker.

[COUGH] And it works quite well, but there are occasionally errors in

which the participants get kind of tripped up and they speak at the same time.

But it's pretty rare and

there are remarkably good mechanisms in place to overcome simultaneous speech.

In texting, well, it is also turn by turn.

Each message is a turn.

There really is no analogue to simultaneous speech in texting,

although occasionally text message may arrive out of order, out of sequence,

but that's pretty rare.

So while they're both turn by turn,

the idea of stepping on the other person's toes is pretty unlikely in texting.

Another feature that really distinguishes texting and

voice communication is persistence.

So texting is persistent.

That is, one sends a text message and because it's visual it

doesn't go away unless the user deletes it.

It remains on the user's phone.

It also remains in the cloud, but that's a separate issue.

In voice communication the turns are ephemeral.

They go away once they're uttered.

Unless they're audio recorded, there's no record of what has been said.

So that's a big difference.

You can imagine that that might affect people's willingness to provide sensitive

information.

They might be reluctant to provide sensitive information if there's

a permanent record.

And another distinction between the two ways of communicating has to do with

nonverbal cues, such as what are sometimes called paralinguistic features,

like ums and uhs.

With voice, ums and uhs just come with the territory.

It's rich with respect to these paralinguistic cues.

With texting there's virtually none of this unless somebody

intentionally includes it.

So you can type into a text message, to communicate perhaps,

uncertainty about the rest of the message.

But short of that,

there's virtually no analogue to paralinguistic forms of speech.

And then a final attribute that's quite different between voice and

texting is the way multitasking occurs.

So there are types of multitasking with voice and text, but they're different.

So with voice it tends to be simultaneous, so one might be speaking on the phone

while cooking, kind of doing the two things in parallel.

At some deep internal level shifting between the tasks, but

really engaging in the two tasks at the same time.

But with texting it's pretty unlikely that one is both entering text

into a text message and doing another task.

But once a text message is sent, it's completely normal to

switch to another task between the time the text message is sent and

the time the user reads the reply to that text message.

So all kinds of, the rest of life takes place between text messages.

So it's really a task switching approach versus a simultaneous

multitasking with voice.

So these are a number of differences, and there are others in this table,

that could lead to differences between the data,

and particularly the data quality, collected with text and voice.

So we'll turn shortly to evidence about measurement quality in text versus voice.

But before doing that, let's talk about coverage and

coverage error in text interviews because if the people

who text are different from the people who don't text, then we have the same

kind of problem we've discussed with web access in general.

So the idea is that, of course,

people who are not mobile phone owners are not likely to be texters.

But it could well be that among mobile phone owners,

those who do not text are different on some of the attributes we might want to

measure in a survey than those who do text.

But we just don't know.

So a first investigation of coverage error is reported in

an in-press chapter by Conrad and

colleagues in which the authors looked at results from a telephone survey

conducted by the Pew Organization in which they asked, among other things, whether

they were mobile phone owners, and if they were, they asked them if they texted.

And the survey also produced demographic data for

these respondents, ao we can see if those mobile phone owners who text

differ demographically from those mobile phone owners who do not text.

And in the table here you can see that the demographic variables produced by this

survey are age, sex, education, race, ethnicity, and income.

And if you look under the column A for mobile phone owners and

compare that to the values in column B for mobile phone owners who text,

you can see that there are a few differences, but not many.

There are differences in age, so

fewer mobile phone owners who text are older than 34 years old.

In other words, texters are younger than non-texters and

there are slightly more college graduates, significantly but slightly,

more college graduates among mobile phone owners who text than those who don't text.

But other than that, there are no differences on the other attributes.

And so the question is whether these two differences are likely to affect

the answers that are collected in a survey that's conducted via texting.

Another thing to consider is that the proportion of texters among

mobile phone owners is growing, and that as it grows, any bias,

in terms, for example, of age and education, is likely to be reduced.

Also from Pew, texting rates among US mobile phone owners have been on the rise

and are continuing to rise.

So if we were to project where texting by mobile phone owners is going,

we can see that we're approaching full coverage and that

there may be no difference between mobile phone owners who text and those who don't.

So we'll turn next to a discussion of measurement in text message surveys,

focusing on a laboratory experiment that compares text and voice data collection.

I'll see you in just a minute.

Explorer notre catalogue

Rejoignez-nous gratuitement et obtenez des recommendations, des mises à jour et des offres personnalisées.

Coursera propose un accès universel à la meilleure formation au monde, en partenariat avec des universités et des organisations du plus haut niveau, pour proposer des cours en ligne.

© 2019 Coursera Inc. Tous droits réservés.

Télécharger dans l'App Store

Disponible sur Google Play

Coursera
À propos
Direction
Carrières
Catalogue
Certificats
Certificats MasterTrack™
Diplômes
For Enterprise
For Government

Communauté
Learners
Partners
Developers
Beta Testers
Translators

Se connecter
Blog
Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter
Instagram
YouTube
Blog Tech

Plus
Conditions
Confidentialité
Aide
Accessibilité
Presse
Contact
Répertoire
Filiales