Explore
For Enterprise
Join for Free
Log In

Arts et humanités
Business
Informatique
Science des données
Technologies de l'information
santé
Mathématiques et logique
Développement personnel
Sciences physiques et ingénierie
Sciences sociales
Apprentissage des langues
Diplômes
Certificats

Explorez l'intégralité de Coursera

Parcourir
Rechercher
For Enterprise
Connexion
Inscrivez-vous gratuitement

11.8.2

Loading...

Social Norms, Social Change II

Université de Pennsylvanie

4.8 (208 notes) | 7.3K étudiants inscrits

This course is Part 2 of the Social Norms, Social Change series. In this course, we will examine social change, the tools we may use to enact change, and put into practice all we have learned in Part 1. See Social Norms, Social Change Part I at this link: https://coursera.org/learn/norms This course covers scripts and schemas, the cognitive structures in which social expectations are embedded, and their relationship with social norms. The course then examines the essentials of norm abandonment, including the relations between personal beliefs and social expectations. We will also evaluate existing intervention strategies, including legal reforms, information campaigns, economic incentives, and group deliberations. Finally, we look at a variety of tools policy makers may use to effect change, highlight the role of trendsetters in social change, and explore the conditions under which they can be successful. The course is a joint Penn-UNICEF project." Please see the following link for a 30% discount on the book that accompanies this course: https://global.oup.com/academic/product/9780190622053/?cc=us&lang=en&promocode=AAFLYG6

Visualiser le programme de cours

Avis

4.8 (208 notes)

5 stars
170 ratings
4 stars
31 ratings
3 stars
5 ratings
1 star
2 ratings

IC

Oct 19, 2017

well organized, information straight to point, with clear simple examples, eventhough the course was full of terms but it was explained in very simple English.

AC

Oct 29, 2017

Great continuation to Social Norms Social Change I, goes more into actionable identification and evaluation techniques.

À partir de la leçon

Norm Abandonment

This module covers the essentials of norm abandonment, including the relations between personal beliefs and social expectations. It also evaluates existing intervention strategies, including legal reforms, information campaigns, economic incentives, and group deliberations.

Introduction1:48

Enseigné par

Cristina Bicchieri
S. J. Patterson Harvie Professor of Social Thought and Comparative Ethics

Transcription

[MUSIC]

Many of the successful interventions that use community deliberation

guide people to reach their own conclusion from shared accepted premises.

Recall the social norms are not isolated cultural practices, they are steeped

in a complex network of factual beliefs, normative beliefs, and values.

Because of different strengths in the links within a semantic network,

a productive and protracted discussion should never be focused

on just a single practice or a norm.

Ignoring the connection between certain practices and

the web of beliefs they are embedded in could prevent the recognition

of inconsistencies between these elements.

Implicitly directed arguments, which allow participant to discover inconsistencies

on their own, encourage a discussion of a broader set of elements,

more than explicitly directed argument, which directly expose inconsistencies.

They may highlight the importance of certain values and core beliefs without

immediately involving in discussion of more peripheral beliefs and practices.

For example, a community talks about the importance of core values

such as respect for human life, or love for ones children,

discussions work out in a process of collective deliberation,

the practical consequences of this core beliefs and values.

Covered with credible factual information about certain practices,

individuals may come to realize that what they do contradicts

what they should do as mandated by the values and commitments.

Another important consequence of the liberation

is the potential severing of weak links in a semantic network.

In a semantic network centered on female genital cutting, honor my be

strongly linked to purity and purity weakly linked to female genital cutting.

It would easier to sever the link between purity and

female genital cutting than to severe the link between honor and purity.

Since the link between purity and

female genital cutting is not central to many other beliefs.

Severing weak links becomes easier when alternatives are presented.

The girl can still be pure without being cut.

In this way, central values and core beliefs are not challenged.

But individuals are re-oriented to draw different conclusions or

recall that the Selma campaign accomplishes these

re-orientation by acknowledging the core values such as honor and

purity can be better embodied in a whole, uncut, untouched girl body.

I have argued that individuals need

reasons to change their beliefs and behavior.

People are not likely to engage in spontaneous discussion about the validity

of norms or practices that they have been in place for a long time.

Moreover, drawing attention to implicit core values and

their consequences as well as potential inconsistencies between those values and

certain practices is not a short term easy process.

This another reason why discussions should be guided.

Facilitator will know, and share certain core values and beliefs,

and thus are likely to be accepted by the community play an important

role in steering the discussion down a particular direction such that implicit

core values are unearthed and inconsistencies are highlighted.

Group discussion has an important public dimension.

All the tools I have listed in this lecture

make people aware that others are being exposed to the same message.

But, group deliberation has several advantages.

During the discussion,

general acceptance of certain arguments becomes visible, which may induce

participants to be more willing to accept such arguments themselves.

Discussion helps to change our personal normative and

factual beliefs and to observe the other beliefs are changing too.

The process of belief change becomes a collective one

as we change our minds together.

Collectively changing personal normative beliefs weakens the normative expectations

that support the challenge norm at least within the group of discussions.

Let's now listen to some testimony about the importance of collective

discussion >> Well,

it's very important that individuals all change their own factual beliefs,

are able to share it with their neighbors, share it with other individuals.

Because in so doing, a better understanding is taking place.

Much more effective communication and

common understanding of the issue is being achieved.

If that doesn't happen, the individual simply has the knowledge to themselves.

>> Keyword in committee later presentation are the first words.

Committee late, you don't approach only one individual.

You call the entire committee into a discussion on dialogue so

that this analyze yet as a committee, they analyze their own situation.

And then they discuss and

come to an agreement from the effects of open reputation, their own communication.

>> Again, a lot of people like to gravitate towards, let's say,

the hardware parts of it.

So having village savings and loan groups and

having some kind of economic assets but the software part is very important.

Those discussions with groups of women and groups of men around what it means

to be a woman, what it means to be a man, power in the household.

And not necessarily telling people right, but opening a space for

them to discuss it and facilitating it in a safe way and

in a smart way that's very necessary for these interventions to work.

>> Through the discussions, traditional leaderships start to change in

talking about issues that they were not talking to the community.

They become part of the communities and when the communities and

the talk is open, you find that collective action and

commitment includes even traditional leaders.

Not only that, it can include government sectors because

they come up as community members not only as politicians or

as people of the decision making sector on.

>> Yet accepting an argument and change in behavior are very different things.

Group discussion may successfully change personal

normative beliefs even local normative expectations.

But what leads to stable behavioral change?

For a norm to change in a large population,

a sizable majority of consensus must be reached.

In rounds of collective discussions,

a group may come to agree that the old norms should not be upheld and

subsequently envision and agree upon a new practice and promise to follow it.

Unless the group is isolated and

interaction with other groups are limited, the problem of moving a large

majority in a counter-normative direction remains a difficult one.

Again, we face a collective action problem.

Explorer notre catalogue

Rejoignez-nous gratuitement et obtenez des recommendations, des mises à jour et des offres personnalisées.

Coursera propose un accès universel à la meilleure formation au monde, en partenariat avec des universités et des organisations du plus haut niveau, pour proposer des cours en ligne.

© 2019 Coursera Inc. Tous droits réservés.

Télécharger dans l'App Store

Disponible sur Google Play

Coursera
À propos
Direction
Carrières
Catalogue
Certificats
Certificats MasterTrack™
Diplômes
For Enterprise
For Government

Communauté
Learners
Partners
Developers
Beta Testers
Translators

Se connecter
Blog
Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter
Instagram
YouTube
Blog Tech

Plus
Conditions
Confidentialité
Aide
Accessibilité
Presse
Contact
Répertoire
Filiales