Chevron Left
Retour à Writing in English at University

Avis et commentaires pour d'étudiants pour Writing in English at University par Université de Lund

4.7
étoiles
318 évaluations
73 avis

À propos du cours

Acquiring good academic research and writing skills early on is essential for your success both at university and in your professional life. This course aims: - to give you an understanding of the conventions of academic writing in English and to teach you the components and benefits of what is called process writing. - to help you to put together your own “toolbox” of academic writing skills, as well as to give you a chance to test out these tools and to reflect on your own development as a writer. - to encourage reflection on discipline specific conventions; although the course deals with generic skills, you will be able to apply these generic skills to meet the particular needs of your own discipline. The course consists of four modules: 1. Writing in English at university: An introduction 2. Structuring your text and conveying your argument 3. Using sources in academic writing 4. The writer’s toolbox: Editing and proofreading In each module you will find video lectures and reading assignments and assignments, such as quizzes, reflective self-assessment questions, as well as some peer review exercises in which you will have an opportunity to interact with other students taking the course....

Meilleurs avis

TP

Dec 24, 2018

This course shared a lot of useful suggestions for writing in English at University. It will be an essential lesson for anyone who prepare their next education development.

ZO

Apr 23, 2018

Excellent course for anyone who wants to learn or improve on proper academic writing. Especially useful if you're new to European and North-American Universities.

Filtrer par :

51 - 73 sur 73 Avis pour Writing in English at University

par Rafael P

May 19, 2019

Excelente curso

par Hằng T

Mar 17, 2018

Awesome course!

par Sandro J A L

Jan 28, 2020

Good course.

par Rashad a

Apr 25, 2019

Great course

par Bshayr f

Jun 24, 2020

Good course

par Priyanshu T

Aug 25, 2019

excellent

par Kiew W C

Nov 14, 2017

Thank you

par Manuel B

Apr 11, 2017

Excelente

par Rogelio E R C

Apr 21, 2020

great¡

par 余楚钧

Dec 04, 2016

很系统,不错

par Mohammad Y

Nov 02, 2018

great

par Rafat A A

Aug 29, 2017

good

par Mohamed T A

Aug 08, 2017

good

par Kathrin T

Aug 03, 2019

The course is very helpful, for anyone at the beginner's level. It provides very useful hints and insights. I would have given the course five stars, if I also would have had a lesson, which helped practise critical writing and in this writing learning how to correctly embed the work of researches. As it is a crucial task for anyone writing a thesis or a dissertation. I find the pace and explanations very adequate.

par Deonisia

Mar 17, 2017

I was studied about academic writing but did not finish, still reading on recommend references. Academic writing tells about communicative what is the objective of the essay who is your audience. Academic writing looks about the flow and writibg style. It avoid writing in short form like can't and ensures vocabulary.

par Diego M

Feb 06, 2017

Has plenty of material, the activities are most of the time very useful. I spent a lot of time reading the AWELU material and other web references, that were extremely valuables for me; however, the videos sometimes are not very productive and slow paced and some activities came very often and were not needed.

par Fatima t Z A S

Feb 05, 2019

It's a good course for the students who want to improve their academic writing. This course helped me out in writing better essays and assignments at university level.

par David G B

May 27, 2017

Excellent! Just need a bit of improvement on the tests.

par Taghizadeh

Aug 28, 2018

Very good and informative course. Useful materials.

par SWATHI H G

Dec 21, 2019

Very good course to take for English writing.

par 周东升

Mar 17, 2019

nice

par Warisra W

Sep 24, 2017

good

par Jisha G

Jun 15, 2020

All the classes were good and the sources were too long and so much to read. Could be more practical and better.