Existían comandos de laboratorio que estaban desactualizados y no funcionaban a la perfección.

The quicklabs dont follow, always in unfinished state even if finished.

Presenters are not engaged what they are saying.

Some labs are unclear and some also have errors

scripts failed some times

Need from disucssion

Average content, mostly read out frog GCP documentation. Trainers presentations are not interesting, very rarely any value add i.e. interesting case studies, trade offs etc. are discussed. The Lab is full of errors. I had raised a number of them with Quicklab. The lab codes are not well organised, instructions are not clear at many places. It wasted hours of mine. I would like Coursera to make refund. Honestly, was expecting much quality from Coursera given my earlier experiences were really good.

Needs better hands on labs and quizes. tighter learning feedback loops. Need to use exponential memory markers better.

would rate it very low because of less information on the course.

I think should be more clear and use other languages like Java

Many errors in lab

1 star because one of the instructor speaks too fast without proper pauses and feels like rushing the course videos. Not happy at all.

Some lab have issues and the team concern is not fixing , for e.g App Dev - Deploying an API for the Quiz Application: Node.js

Super easy quizes. Very low quality course & certificate.

Sub standard!