Chevron Left
Retour à Quantitative Methods

Avis et commentaires pour d'étudiants pour Quantitative Methods par Université d'Amsterdam

4.7
étoiles
1,810 évaluations
641 avis

À propos du cours

Discover the principles of solid scientific methods in the behavioral and social sciences. Join us and learn to separate sloppy science from solid research! This course will cover the fundamental principles of science, some history and philosophy of science, research designs, measurement, sampling and ethics. The course is comparable to a university level introductory course on quantitative research methods in the social sciences, but has a strong focus on research integrity. We will use examples from sociology, political sciences, educational sciences, communication sciences and psychology....

Meilleurs avis

LG
4 janv. 2018

This course was excellent in all aspects, including the interesting and extensive material, as well as Dr. Annemarie Zand Scholten's brilliant lectures that help students digest and enjoy the content.

AL
7 mai 2018

It is well-structured and informative. The pop up questions are interactive and the animation is fun. I have learned a lot from the video instruction, recommended readings, and assignments. Thanks.

Filtrer par :

626 - 635 sur 635 Avis pour Quantitative Methods

par smeets

28 mai 2016

very good course, but I never recieved the feedback I needed on the forum

par ANUPAMA R

24 juin 2020

Too long and difficult as there are more number of peer reviews

par tengson p

11 janv. 2017

Fairly good. Fundamental knowledge for researcher.

par Hafeez A

25 oct. 2015

interesting and informative course.

par Tarjani P

8 août 2020

good

par Cynthia C

6 sept. 2020

The material is good. However, the peer review format is poor. Most students submit copied answers, literally, they are all the same and they are not even correct. Student's don't bother reading the instructions or questions of the tests. Which indicates that I don't even know if their review of my own submissions are correctly evaluated. And the professors of the course are not available.

par Jason M H

4 mars 2016

Over reliance on student grading. Material does not map well to the quizzes.

par Marc F

25 mars 2018

too much work, too much specific question, alot of not related knowledge that we need to learn... Not useful in my opinion.

par Winthrop Y

19 avr. 2016

Excellent lectures, good tests, too many peer evaluations!

par Maryam s s O A

21 févr. 2021

.