Lot's of problems with the autograder, lack of teaching staff support to answer questions in a timely manner. Assignments need to be more representative of class lectures.

Content wise is ok. An easy introduction. The bugs made it annoying. Especially Week 2 final exercise https://nzh13lxjj0.execute-api.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/prod/index/2/

Exercises at the end are way harder than they should be for how little is taught during the actual course. 1 question from each final exercise is more than enough.

It would be a very nice course... if this guy was actually teaching and not explaining the basics and expecting people just to search online of the remaining 90%

the voice of the teacher is not loud plus the assignments are too tough to clear, I think a basic version of learning pandas should be there before this course.

Too fast and need to break the content even smaller with frequent practise assignment and graded quiz, just make it like python for everybody specialization

I didn’t like how the subjects are explained, and i feel the grading system is not good at all. It would be better if assignments were graded by peers.

The course rushes through a lot of concepts and expects the learner to figure out real insights using public resources. The reference material is poor.

A horrible course with very little detail than required, I had to access a lot of additional resources than coursera in order to complete this course.

The content of teaching in videos is a way too less than the level of asssignments .I had to make a lot of efforts on my own to understand the things.

The ways is taught is not very good - basically a lot info in short timespan. I don't think the Jupyter Notebooks format is the adequate for teaching.

its hard for beginners to understand in the flow , it took me time to complete the course by studying about the same concept in other resources too

For some reason the format in which the lectures are organized lack a lot of tact and seem to be made with no pedagogic consideration whatsoever.

Explanations of python were pretty coarse, the video was not helping much. I feel like I spent time doing 99% of python and 1% of data science.

Many bugs, lecture content does not cover topics required to complete the assignments, assignment instructions are not written in a clear way.

The speaker speaks too fast for any useful "sharing". One need to do reverse engineering to understand the code and underlying concept.

Videos not very explanatory, ended up being a lot of self-teaching, video seemed too scripted and didn't really explain concepts well

Good course materials and the assignment itself is pretty good, but the grader is buggy, not informative and wasted a lot of my time.

Too much focus on databases and database operations, rather than data science.

The assignments are too difficult for a 4 week course.

Assignments were not clearly documented, causing lot of time spent in understanding the requirements than implementing a solution.

The course is very fast-paced and explanations are not clear neither detailed, it looks like instructors are just doing formality

This is a poorly taught course which tells you to go away and teach yourself data science rather than teaching you data science.

The assignments are very difficult and when you submit you do not get a proper review where are the mistakes. Not recommended.

The learning is very fast paced.It seems like the trainer is in hurry.He just touched some keyword without going into details.

The instructor is very fast and assignments are very tough. Their is huge difference between the course and the structure.