Avis et commentaires pour d'étudiants pour Gestion de projets : Les bases de la réussite par Université de Californie à Irvine

Very basic. The structure is odd; the last week contains more material than the rest of the course put together.

In my opinion a clear guideline is missing. The terms are not always the same and it's sometimes confusing.

The class and the content is very good! But the way that the professor teachs is kind of boring for me.

The videos are too much elongated and boring. They failed to give good information in interactive way.

The cource is very basic. You should only take this, if you know nothing about project management.

Speaker is too fast and too vague, he doesn't seem to be overly interested in the subject matter.

It's a good course. It is very simple. It's just exposition and quizzes. Great for beginners.

Overview with key terminology and process information. Good introduction and/or refresher.

The quiz section is very hard and not user friendly. Feedback system is quite poor either

It has a good level, but there is room for improvement. Keep on the good work! Thanks!

Good effort from Prof Stone in providing as much real-life relevance to the course.

Very basic course that provides basic background information on project management.

Very little course but gives you a base to understand how project management works

Not bad, the professor is very comunicative but I expected a bit more of contents

The teacher could be more enthusiastic because sometimes it turned boring.

Important basics for people starting their Project Management endeavour.

not very helpful for the PMP exam preparation. too basic and too easy.

The course is too short. It seems that many materials are removed.

Good introductory course. Could use more Execution related tools.

Speak too fast and lack of interaction in the first 3 modules.

Creo que esta muy sencillo y básico para lo que yo esperaba.

Missed Agile Framework and other emerging techniques.

Good content but the communication is not so great.

Too basic, not enough coverage of topics discussed.

The content was well explained but a bit "light".