NS
12 juil. 2020
Solid course that dives deeper into the fundamentals of CS. Great instruction, attention to detail and the excercises are adequately challenging for beginners and lower-intermediate programmers.
RJ
9 juil. 2022
Jen and Paul provide thorough and understandable explanations of Python as a programming language. The assignments are challenging and test the student's knowledge of the subject well.
par Alberto P
•9 sept. 2018
The course was great, I enjoyed it less than the first part though. I feel there was way more support from the mentors and the forums in the first part, whereas in this edition there was almost nobody posting around and helping. Still, as the other one great teaching from both professors and great content. Thank you!
par Irina K
•24 mars 2017
Quite simple course for those, who has already learned some python, but has some drawbacks in knowledge of unit testing, exceptions and classes. All examples are understandable and simple.
Although expected more about quality code crafting, some hints and best practices, that could help in real life of the developer.
par Li H Y
•27 juin 2017
Overall it is a very great course. The material is well-structured and worth to learn.
This course worth 4 stars but not 5 because the instructors seldom answer questions in the forum. Fellow students need to help each other and sometimes there is no help from everyone.
par Daniel B
•18 déc. 2021
Teachers have a great knowledge and explain the concepts in a plain view, easy to understand. However, they use propietary software (from Apple) and do not use a standarize docsting format.
par Greg D
•1 juil. 2020
Mostly accurate per overview.
Using versions of Python no longer supported to auto-mark submissions, should be updated.
Otherwise, rigorous detail for the quality of crafting code.
par Andrew J M
•23 mars 2022
The course was great but I didn't recieve any replies when I was asking for help on the extremely hard final assignment. But passing the final assignment felt sooooo good
par Balazs L
•2 juin 2022
Besides TDD and proper comments, there wasn't much said about quality code.
The runner for the assignment is not working, which made the assignment pretty anti climactic.
par Branimir L
•9 avr. 2017
It does not fulfills completely its title 'Crafting Quality Code'. Nevertheless, it does pay attention to unit testing and taking care of the design via design recipes.
par Kseniia S
•30 sept. 2020
Generally good, but a bit worse than the first part. There were some inconsistencies in the tests and tasks and instructors didn't answer questions in the forum.
par Christian B M
•20 mars 2017
Good course, especially the doc and unit testing parts. I had hoped for a more advanced implementations, but thank you for mentioning the exec function.
par Aiden S
•19 nov. 2020
Course is good for knowledge but there are a lot of mistakes in certain quizzes and is a difficult without a mentor in the forums.
par Alejandro G Z
•27 mai 2020
Very helpful concepts, clearly and thoroughly explained. I found the Testing chapter especially useful. Thanks!
par David A G
•21 juil. 2020
Si completaste Learn to Program: The Fundamentals, recomiendo que sigas aprendiendo con este curso.
par vlady N
•16 juin 2020
The end Assignment has been lacking instructions for an end-to-end testing and local implementation
par Emil L
•17 juil. 2020
Very well structured. Good quiz and assignments. Builds a solid foundation.
par Tyson C
•12 juin 2017
Look like not many people around, no one do peer review for my assignment
par Jbene M
•21 août 2019
Very practical. I have learned a lot from this course.
par Ashwani k G
•28 avr. 2017
Wonderful course. Got to learn many things.
par Benoit I
•26 mars 2017
Very interresting course for Python lovers.
par Francisco B
•4 nov. 2021
A good course, but a bit overdated.
par Xuetao H
•12 juin 2017
very basic stuff and very easy.
par Daya_Jin
•29 sept. 2018
内容有干货,但讲的太枯燥,听得想睡觉
par Seha I O
•26 janv. 2018
Thank you!
par Rey O
•1 juil. 2017
It would've been better that these very long read exercises be put into a programming exercise. Being presented with a couple of correct answers (but inefficient) takes a lot of time for us to figure it out. If you guys really insist on this kind of exercises, it's better to give us 3 or maybe 4 correct answers and we choose what we think is the most efficient one. That way, if we got the wrong answer, it's our job as why our chosen answer is not the most efficient one.
par Viktoriia T
•29 avr. 2020
I took The fundamental course by the same lectors, and it was really nice. So I decided to proceed to the next course, that they have. But, it was not so good as the previous one.
It is no mentor on this course, so you will not get any support, if you will get some questions.
Also, materials in week 4 presented in bad quality. It is too fast and not clear at all.