Avis et commentaires pour d'étudiants pour Apprendre à programmer : créer un codage de qualité par Université de Toronto
À propos du cours
Meilleurs avis
Solid course that dives deeper into the fundamentals of CS. Great instruction, attention to detail and the excercises are adequately challenging for beginners and lower-intermediate programmers.
Great instructors, liked the way they reinforced concepts through quizzes during lecture. Also appreciated and enjoyed the content of the lectures as well as the project assignments.
126 - 150 sur 161 Avis pour Apprendre à programmer : créer un codage de qualité
par Branimir L
•It does not fulfills completely its title 'Crafting Quality Code'. Nevertheless, it does pay attention to unit testing and taking care of the design via design recipes.
par Kseniia S
•Generally good, but a bit worse than the first part. There were some inconsistencies in the tests and tasks and instructors didn't answer questions in the forum.
par Christian B M
•Good course, especially the doc and unit testing parts. I had hoped for a more advanced implementations, but thank you for mentioning the exec function.
par Aiden S
•Course is good for knowledge but there are a lot of mistakes in certain quizzes and is a difficult without a mentor in the forums.
par Alejandro G Z
•Very helpful concepts, clearly and thoroughly explained. I found the Testing chapter especially useful. Thanks!
par David A G
•Si completaste Learn to Program: The Fundamentals, recomiendo que sigas aprendiendo con este curso.
par vlady N
•The end Assignment has been lacking instructions for an end-to-end testing and local implementation
par Emil L
•Very well structured. Good quiz and assignments. Builds a solid foundation.
par Tyson C
•Look like not many people around, no one do peer review for my assignment
par Jbene M
•Very practical. I have learned a lot from this course.
par Ashwani k G
•Wonderful course. Got to learn many things.
par Benoit I
•Very interresting course for Python lovers.
par Francisco B
•A good course, but a bit overdated.
par Xuetao H
•very basic stuff and very easy.
par Daya_Jin
•内容有干货，但讲的太枯燥，听得想睡觉
par Seha I O
•Thank you!
par Rey O
•It would've been better that these very long read exercises be put into a programming exercise. Being presented with a couple of correct answers (but inefficient) takes a lot of time for us to figure it out. If you guys really insist on this kind of exercises, it's better to give us 3 or maybe 4 correct answers and we choose what we think is the most efficient one. That way, if we got the wrong answer, it's our job as why our chosen answer is not the most efficient one.
par Viktoriia T
•I took The fundamental course by the same lectors, and it was really nice. So I decided to proceed to the next course, that they have. But, it was not so good as the previous one.
It is no mentor on this course, so you will not get any support, if you will get some questions.
Also, materials in week 4 presented in bad quality. It is too fast and not clear at all.
par anu g
•This last exercise was challenging and took a while for me because i didn't really have a good explanation of the specific variable names that i should use to coincide with the ratrace file. also, there is not active mentor to ask questions to!
par Adam S
•The course was fine, but some of the problems where discussed to quickly, with to little examples and assignments, and I couldn't keep up. Especially the whole "class" part.
par Mohsen H
•one of the instructors, (Paul) is frustratingly confusing and unorganized!! sigh ....
par Sergio I G E
•Good course, but not everything was well explained, and the mentors didn't show up.
par Mikhail G
•It is better to have more bite-sized assignments than the last one
par Aldana R
•The topics were good, but they were not well explained.
Coursera Footer
