SP
15 avr. 2020
This course was very interesting and helpful in the initialization of web development also the course instructor is very good she delivers her knowledge up to maximum possibilities and also motivates.
NP
18 mai 2020
I really enjoyed everything about this course. I thought the exercises/quizzes were fair and the instructor showed me many things that will serve me well going forward. Great course, great instructor!
par Kevin B J
•11 juin 2021
good
par Om G
•2 juil. 2020
great
par Albin F
•20 mai 2020
great
par Kapil R
•9 sept. 2017
GOOD.
par Vishal t
•3 sept. 2020
good
par K M M H R
•23 juil. 2020
Good
par THIPPAVARAM A
•15 juil. 2020
Good
par Harshad S
•14 juin 2020
nice
par PAVITHRA H
•7 juin 2020
good
par KOMPELLA S R H
•8 mai 2020
nice
par ANIKET P
•18 juin 2020
ok
par Hardik C
•4 mars 2022
t
par Deleted A
•22 sept. 2021
par Lezlie B
•7 févr. 2016
F
par Martina W
•7 févr. 2016
If there had been a working autograder for the last final project this course would have been worth it somehow.
What does that mean?
- The lectures provided valuable information.
- The quizzes generally made sense (in relation to the lectures).
- Learning how to code wasn't really possible.
Why is that?
- There is only one programming assignment.
- The autograder doesn't give any feedback at all why resp. where things go wrong. That's everything but good style (for software as well as for learning).
- Code snippets can't be tested individually. That's very bad behavior in programming.
- At the end working code that meets the teached rules is marked as wrong. You are lost without any clue.
So probably you can learn something. Unfortunately you can't possibly finish the course with a feeling of success.
par Jean-Christophe B
•1 oct. 2015
The lectures get you through the basics in a clear, understandable way.
But the auto-grader was really a bad idea, that got the lecturer into a lot of trouble for very little gain if any.
It seems to me that peer-reviewed assessments, with proper instructions, are better suited. Apart from being more reliable and less frustrating, I think the learner can really get more out of it.
par Bair
•6 août 2020
The course is good for beginners, thats true, but there is no operative support with technical issues. I wasted 3 days waiting for "Final Quiz" from 3 week of HTML course will be available to complete because images of the quiz questions were not visible at all.
par Hank B
•14 juin 2016
More interactive assignments using the parser would have been great. As it stands, the quizzes had mostly relevant content, but the lessons were anything but engaging. Having Colleen talk at the camera for 5-12 minutes per video got tedious really quick.
par Deniz S
•27 sept. 2015
It may be a 5 weeks course with a more slow learning, because we see some tags in a second and it passes. And the autograder works really bad. I do not know where I fail but I failed all the questions. A peer grader would be nice for the final project.
par Ahmad B S
•8 déc. 2015
Thank you for you time and for everything you did.
As an introduction, I did not find that there's need to talk about the hosting and the other things related to this topic. It would be better if the instructor went deeper into the HTML5.
par Saša K
•5 janv. 2016
The teacher is excellent.
This is excellent but poor introduction to HTML.
The course, which is part of specialization should be much more detailed. With much more axamples. I think it is not worth 49$.
par Edward F
•5 oct. 2015
This course was clearly not ready. The autograder for the final project was.. a complete fail. It was not a fun experience trying to change around my code to figure out what the autograder wanted.
par Tarek H
•13 févr. 2017
The lectures and assignments questions are more about the history of the internet and HTML. although I've finished the course but it wasn't as good as i thought.
par Emily L
•16 avr. 2020
Extremely basic, yet some of the concepts and their applications weren't well explained in the videos. I found the accompanying text to be dense and unclear.
par Maria-Elena F
•18 janv. 2019
Not very clear in some parts and the videos stopping for that style of questioning is annoying. The optional reading was much more useful than the required.