Avis et commentaires pour d'étudiants pour How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper (Project-Centered Course) par École polytechnique
À propos du cours
Meilleurs avis
TD
20 nov. 2021
I really liked the course and the contents are great. Except for the language problem, everything else is very good, and really enjoyed learning from peers and instructors. Thank you for the platform.
SM
11 avr. 2020
The content was very good and explanation was excellent just there was a slight problem with instructors accent but don't worry you will get used to it no time but the course is excellent and helpful
801 - 824 sur 824 Avis pour How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper (Project-Centered Course)
par Yasser A A
•15 déc. 2020
The content of the course is good but the review process need to be improved. The assignments should be reviewed by the instructors
par Ar S S u R
•8 mai 2020
INITIAL PEER GRADING WAS NOT VERY MATURE ENOUGH IN GRADING MY ASSIGNMENT SERIOUSLY..
par Carlos R S J
•5 avr. 2016
It is good, but there is a student speaking that is really difficult to understand.
par karuppuchamy.v
•27 avr. 2020
Exteremely good course for those who r doing research ....Thanks to whole Team.
par Joseph V B B
•8 juil. 2020
It is very good for undergraduate students starting their research projects
par Debyani R
•7 mai 2020
Please make it easier to understand the peer-grade assignment and process.
par Derrick G
•26 janv. 2020
not very useful because there are few examples of it.
par Wisam A W
•12 sept. 2017
A good summary on how to start thinking research!
par David E F G
•23 juin 2020
The grading is a mess. The content is good.
par Vincentius A B
•8 juin 2020
Somewhat not really practical
par Olga T
•17 avr. 2017
Very basic
par Ravindra M
•25 mai 2020
good
par Mohsan U A
•1 mai 2020
Good
par Ranakishore P
•24 avr. 2020
Good
par Prodromos V
•25 avr. 2022
Too basic, especially when considering "it was written from PhD students for PhD students". The course lacks substance and the advice is too general and intuitive (for master of PhD students which of course as mentioned is the targeted audience of this course). I would much rather recommend "Writing in the Sciences" - this is what this course should have been (however note that that writing in the sciences is teaches principles through medical articles).
par Zandro A
•22 juin 2020
I higly recommend to revise the scoring rubrics for the assignment -checklist. I dont see it fare to give between 75 and 100 for the score to the fact that we made an effort doing the checklist better to other options such as 80 or 85 orchange the checlist instead since wehave different style in making a checklist. Thanks and more power still a good and interesting course
par Ghadeer
•24 déc. 2020
A laughable course and very poorly prepared, almost a complete waste of time if not for the final exercise
par Adlirrahman A M
•23 juil. 2020
The course is great but the peer reviews by other participant are horrible
par ABDULLAH B
•13 oct. 2020
Excellent course for PHD students only.
par Helena V B
•7 sept. 2020
This review is not about the course itself but the unenrollment.
I am not able to unenroll this course which is kind of annoying because I am not able to follow this course due to personal reasons. So I would like to unenroll but it is not possible which is kind of stupid.
I do think this is a great course for PhD students, but not for me since I'm not even close to a PhD
par Mona A E E
•18 juil. 2020
language is not clear as English isnt the original language of the instructor .Really I cant completee the course as i cant understand their accent at all
par Ntando M
•7 janv. 2022
please unenroll me from this course. I will do it at a later date. thank you... the unenroll button is not there
par Ahmed E
•26 juil. 2020
Very bad
par Allena V S A 1
•26 févr. 2021
ok ok
Coursera Footer
