Chevron Left
Retour à How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper (Project-Centered Course)

Avis et commentaires pour d'étudiants pour How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper (Project-Centered Course) par École polytechnique

4.6
étoiles
2,374 évaluations

À propos du cours

What you will achieve: In this project-based course, you will outline a complete scientific paper, choose an appropriate journal to which you'll submit the finished paper for publication, and prepare a checklist that will allow you to independently judge whether your paper is ready to submit. What you'll need to get started: This course is designed for students who have previous experience with academic research - you should be eager to adapt our writing and publishing advice to an existing personal project. If you just finished your graduate dissertation, just began your PhD, or are at a different stage of your academic journey or career and just want to publish your work, this course is for you. *About Project-Centered Courses: Project-Centered Courses are designed to help you complete a personally meaningful real-world project, with your instructor and a community of learners with similar goals providing guidance and suggestions along the way. By actively applying new concepts as you learn, you’ll master the course content more efficiently; you’ll also get a head start on using the skills you gain to make positive changes in your life and career. When you complete the course, you’ll have a finished project that you’ll be proud to use and share....

Meilleurs avis

TD

20 nov. 2021

I really liked the course and the contents are great. Except for the language problem, everything else is very good, and really enjoyed learning from peers and instructors. Thank you for the platform.

SM

11 avr. 2020

The content was very good and explanation was excellent just there was a slight problem with instructors accent but don't worry you will get used to it no time but the course is excellent and helpful

Filtrer par :

826 - 850 sur 858 Avis pour How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper (Project-Centered Course)

par Deleted A

15 juin 2017

Would have been significantly better if the course was taught in the native language (French) and then someone fluent in both languages translated. A lot of words were misused or undecipherable because the speakers were not using the language correctly.

Still, the material was helpful and I benefited from the course.

par Príscila A d C

17 avr. 2016

A good course who teaches the way you have to do to write correctly a scientific paper, and gives an idea about the process of publish, it is useful and necessary for those who wants to continuous study and have their own work knows on the fields who works and research.

par Alexander D

29 sept. 2020

Spent one evening to pass all the course. Overly simplistic. Questions after videos are self evident and don't require watching videos. Frankly, I strongly doubt that people passing this course I will succeed in writing peer-reviewed papers.

par Maya S

14 août 2016

The course contains some interesting insights on writing a scientific paper. What I like about the course is that it is given by graduate students. But this is also a drawback. Sometimes, the material seems too simplistic.

par Massimiliano B

7 févr. 2020

I would suggest to be more simple and effective. Discuss concrete cases and details of a about errors and structure of a paper. But really appreciate that the cours is given from PHDs students!

par Syed W H N

12 mai 2020

The content was fine and went pretty smoothly. The real problem was the hassle of getting the accent of most of the instructors. Plus, there're a lot of mistakes in the subtitles as well.

par Sultan B M

19 déc. 2020

Good course for PHD students. Also, it can be beneficial for non academic papers which intended to be submitted industrial conferences.

par Yasser A A

15 déc. 2020

The content of the course is good but the review process need to be improved. The assignments should be reviewed by the instructors

par Ar S S u R

8 mai 2020

INITIAL PEER GRADING WAS NOT VERY MATURE ENOUGH IN GRADING MY ASSIGNMENT SERIOUSLY..

par Carlos R S J

5 avr. 2016

It is good, but there is a student speaking that is really difficult to understand.

par karuppuchamy.v

27 avr. 2020

Exteremely good course for those who r doing research ....Thanks to whole Team.

par Joseph V B B

8 juil. 2020

It is very good for undergraduate students starting their research projects

par Debyani R

7 mai 2020

Please make it easier to understand the peer-grade assignment and process.

par Derrick G

26 janv. 2020

not very useful because there are few examples of it.

par Wisam A W

12 sept. 2017

A good summary on how to start thinking research!

par David E F G

23 juin 2020

The grading is a mess. The content is good.

par Vincentius A B

8 juin 2020

Somewhat not really practical

par Olga T

17 avr. 2017

Very basic

par AMR M

20 oct. 2022

nice

par Ravindra M

25 mai 2020

good

par Mohsan U A

1 mai 2020

Good

par Ranakishore P

24 avr. 2020

Good

par Prodromos V

25 avr. 2022

Too basic, especially when considering "it was written from PhD students for PhD students". The course lacks substance and the advice is too general and intuitive (for master of PhD students which of course as mentioned is the targeted audience of this course). I would much rather recommend "Writing in the Sciences" - this is what this course should have been (however note that that writing in the sciences is teaches principles through medical articles).

par Zandro A

22 juin 2020

I higly recommend to revise the scoring rubrics for the assignment -checklist. I dont see it fare to give between 75 and 100 for the score to the fact that we made an effort doing the checklist better to other options such as 80 or 85 orchange the checlist instead since wehave different style in making a checklist. Thanks and more power still a good and interesting course

par Ghadeer

24 déc. 2020

A laughable course and very poorly prepared, almost a complete waste of time if not for the final exercise