The content was very good and explanation was excellent just there was a slight problem with instructors accent but don't worry you will get used to it no time but the course is excellent and helpful
It was really helpful to me, I hope it will be useful to all researchers who are intensively working for publishing papers in journals. I thank all course instructors who handled the video sessions.
par Debyani R•
Please make it easier to understand the peer-grade assignment and process.
par Derrick G•
not very useful because there are few examples of it.
par Wisam A W•
A good summary on how to start thinking research!
par David E F G•
The grading is a mess. The content is good.
par Vincentius A B•
Somewhat not really practical
par Olga T•
par Ravindra M•
par Mohsan U A•
par RANAKISHOR P•
par Zandro A•
I higly recommend to revise the scoring rubrics for the assignment -checklist. I dont see it fare to give between 75 and 100 for the score to the fact that we made an effort doing the checklist better to other options such as 80 or 85 orchange the checlist instead since wehave different style in making a checklist. Thanks and more power still a good and interesting course
A laughable course and very poorly prepared, almost a complete waste of time if not for the final exercise
par Adlirrahman A M•
The course is great but the peer reviews by other participant are horrible
par ABDULLAH B•
Excellent course for PHD students only.
par Helena V B•
This review is not about the course itself but the unenrollment.
I am not able to unenroll this course which is kind of annoying because I am not able to follow this course due to personal reasons. So I would like to unenroll but it is not possible which is kind of stupid.
I do think this is a great course for PhD students, but not for me since I'm not even close to a PhD
par Mona A E E•
language is not clear as English isnt the original language of the instructor .Really I cant completee the course as i cant understand their accent at all
par Ahmed E•
par Allena V S A 8•