Avis et commentaires pour d'étudiants pour How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper (Project-Centered Course) par École polytechnique
À propos du cours
Meilleurs avis
TD
20 nov. 2021
I really liked the course and the contents are great. Except for the language problem, everything else is very good, and really enjoyed learning from peers and instructors. Thank you for the platform.
SM
11 avr. 2020
The content was very good and explanation was excellent just there was a slight problem with instructors accent but don't worry you will get used to it no time but the course is excellent and helpful
626 - 650 sur 824 Avis pour How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper (Project-Centered Course)
par Khusni S
•19 mai 2020
Thanks
par Ibrahim A K
•21 mai 2020
great
par Kseniia B
•5 déc. 2016
Great
par Maria I B G
•3 avr. 2022
good
par NELSON D C N
•1 juin 2021
good
par Wafa B
•20 mars 2021
Good
par KOTNI S 1
•22 févr. 2021
nice
par Dhanush K
•2 nov. 2020
good
par hema l
•2 nov. 2020
good
par VIGNESH M
•20 oct. 2020
Good
par Charef-Khodja D
•5 oct. 2020
good
par Ra. P l
•1 oct. 2020
well
par Balakumar.M
•30 juil. 2020
Good
par Reethu B
•23 mai 2020
Good
par K V r
•22 mai 2020
good
par Kushlendra K
•18 mai 2020
Best
par Asir M
•18 mai 2020
Good
par Harika B
•14 mai 2020
good
par Sanjay J
•12 mai 2020
Best
par Parrthipan B K
•5 mai 2020
Good
par Doc M Ȝ
•12 sept. 2019
good
par Alexandra R
•26 mai 2021
m
par Abdulrahman S A
•7 janv. 2021
h
par Badie G
•17 oct. 2020
The contents of this course are excellent and very important. The delivary was straight and simple. However, it's clear to me that this course was not updated for a long time. You see sometimes the Speech to Text function either delivers wrong representations or just misses the spoken words. The organizers can communicate with the instructors to correct the captions.
In addition, the last assignment need redesign. I was confused (and looks to me others are too) of what exactly was required. It makes sense to write your own checklist which acts as a summary and an actual tool to be used by the students later, but lack of a reference made it vague. For instance, one peer review actually put up an abstract of a paper, not a checklist. Another I found some introductory sentence like "this is a checklist for...", but then nothing is shown. Since we were asked to develop a table, that what you would expect to see, not what I saw for at least 3 peer review assignments in addition to my own Preview of the final assignment.
par Yara Y E
•5 mai 2020
This course is well-structured and informative. I learned everything from how to write a well laid-out scientific paper to choosing the appropriate journal and, finally, having it published. It added to my knowledge of basic principles and it drew my attention to aspects that I previously overlooked.
However, there were two factors that hampered my learning journey. Firstly, it was sometimes difficult to work out what some of the instructors say due to their foreign accents. As a result, some parts of the transcript below the video were not translated into the intended words. Secondly, I do not prefer to have my assignments corrected by other peers since they will never be as proficient as instructors giving the course. The peers who reviewed my assignments assigned grades that do not match the efforts, and gave poor remarks such as "good" and "done," with no comments or recommendations.
Nevertheless, I would love to thank Coursera and École Polytechnique for putting together this useful, interesting course.
Coursera Footer
