Avis et commentaires pour d'étudiants pour Théorie des jeux II : applications avancées par Université de Stanford
À propos du cours
Meilleurs avis
Jul 17, 2020
This was a wonderful and very mathematically intensive course, but completing all the quizzes gave a great sense of accomplishment and developed my understanding of game theory and its various facets.
May 02, 2017
Very interesting! One missing thing: please write explanations for correct/incorrect questions in quizzes. In the basic course, I found them very helpful in understanding why my reasoning was wrong.
76 - 92 sur 92 Avis pour Théorie des jeux II : applications avancées
par Ryan B
•Jul 06, 2017
A good class with a good formal description and examples of game theoretic concepts.
par Koa Y
•Jan 04, 2019
Great course, I was really overdue but am hoping to get a certificate if possible
par Affandi I
•Apr 13, 2017
Great course, but I think It could be more vivid like its predecessor
par Roland R
•Jan 10, 2018
Great Course, same parts are challenging but i learned a lot about
par Hushan J
•Oct 31, 2017
it's better to give explanations of the quiz when it is passed.
par Daniel A M S
•Jun 22, 2017
It was nice to have a second part with more specific subjects.
par Muhua X
•Sep 11, 2017
It is very challenging but also interesting
par carlo p
•Sep 02, 2019
Excellent skills obtained
par Mufizul I
•Jan 29, 2017
Very nice
par Fred V
•Sep 06, 2020
Auction theory is left to the last lecture, and the influence of voting systems on political mechanisms is barely addressed. 3 different people lecturing, with different communication skills and flaws (hesitations, over-notating, abuse of acronyms), make following the course more difficult than it needs to be. These being said, it is clear that the authors more than know their stuff (at least the theoretical part; we would like to see them perform when bargaining in a souk) and bring a lot into the course.
par Cigdem K
•Oct 16, 2016
The exams did not explain why the wrong answers are wrong. Even after you succeed a test, I expect an explanation of the questions, and the correct answers. Even if I have a correct answer to a question, I don't know if my reasoning is correct..
par Telmo J P P
•Oct 18, 2017
Interesting, but not as good as part I. Some parts of the syllabus were not explained well enough: a lot of results just come out of thin air, and not a lot of intuitions are given.
par Martín B
•Sep 18, 2019
Should have much more real examples. Voting schemes was right, but mechanism design was completely abstract
par Carlos F S T
•Nov 15, 2017
No es tan bueno como el primero. Sin embargo, tomarlo como continuación es interesante.
par Jeppe v P
•Jun 08, 2017
Interesting material, but sometimes hard to follow the lectures.
par Edmund L
•Jun 06, 2020
The beginning of this course was interesting much like Game Theory I, but the latter half of the course went over my head. It would have been helpful if problem sets and exam are given explanations after submission similar to how it was done in Game Theory I. Sometimes I have no idea how particular answers are obtained.
par Mohammad Z
•Sep 09, 2018
poorly explained lectures. you're better off reading a textbook
