May 02, 2017
Very interesting! One missing thing: please write explanations for correct/incorrect questions in quizzes. In the basic course, I found them very helpful in understanding why my reasoning was wrong.
Sep 11, 2016
Outstanding course on Game Theory. Provides excellent mathematical and logical treatment of the concepts and theory. A perfect stepping stone for researchers willing to pursue their research in Gam
par Jie H•
Apr 16, 2019
This course could be better in many ways. However, I really appreciate the efforts the professors made to put up so much information into this short course. It opens many new worlds for me in the universe of game theory, and in particular, the Arrow's theorem is so astonishing that it almost refreshed my thinking on the mechanisms of voting.
par Carlos C•
Jun 28, 2019
The quality of the course is really high and I found it quite demanding, which is nice after the first course. It forces you to focus, review and think deeply about the meaning of the concepts. The exams are well-defined and they test properly the units. Some points aren't perfectly explained but that might be because the requirements for this course are quite high. Someone that is not used to mathematical notation would easily lose the track of the lessons. I hope that there'll be soon a Game Theory III.
par Georges R•
Sep 09, 2019
Really enlightening class!
I now feel empowered to create project management processes that encourage truthfulness and participation of its different stakeholders in my everyday job.
I also found some very interesting parallels with the methodology of pricing and notably price elasticity, which is key when designing a new product or its associated business model.
PS: Although I understand the importance of it being mathematically formalized, I would have loved it to be sometimes more concrete (especially through exercises and quizzes).
Thank you so much,
par Koa Y•
Jan 04, 2019
Great course, I was really overdue but am hoping to get a certificate if possible
par ZHU S•
Jan 11, 2019
The lecture are useful and the lecturer clear in their content and delivery. However, it would be better if more practices with answers can be given, and the tutorial should include questions of greater difficulty, such as those with real game settings and rules to solve for optimum strategy.
par Matthew W•
Nov 05, 2017
A lot of the important results were covered but sometimes results came out of nowhere (for example with optimal auctions and virtual valuations).
par Mufizul I•
Jan 29, 2017
par Muhua X•
Sep 11, 2017
It is very challenging but also interesting
par Daniel A M S•
Jun 22, 2017
It was nice to have a second part with more specific subjects.
Feb 23, 2017
Overall, the course was good. Somehow, the concepts were not as clear as the basic game theory course. Definitely more advanced.
par Roland R•
Jan 10, 2018
Great Course, same parts are challenging but i learned a lot about
par Hushan J•
Oct 31, 2017
it's better to give explanations of the quiz when it is passed.
par george v•
Feb 18, 2017
Great course. Nice retracing of some notions of the course Game Theory like Pareto Oprimality. Nice idea doing some examples on auctions and voting systems. Nice proofs
par Affandi I•
Apr 13, 2017
Great course, but I think It could be more vivid like its predecessor
par Ryan B•
Jul 06, 2017
A good class with a good formal description and examples of game theoretic concepts.
par carlo p•
Sep 02, 2019
Excellent skills obtained
par Telmo J P P•
Oct 18, 2017
Interesting, but not as good as part I. Some parts of the syllabus were not explained well enough: a lot of results just come out of thin air, and not a lot of intuitions are given.
par Cigdem K•
Oct 16, 2016
The exams did not explain why the wrong answers are wrong. Even after you succeed a test, I expect an explanation of the questions, and the correct answers. Even if I have a correct answer to a question, I don't know if my reasoning is correct..
par Jeppe v P•
Jun 08, 2017
Interesting material, but sometimes hard to follow the lectures.
par Carlos F S T•
Nov 15, 2017
No es tan bueno como el primero. Sin embargo, tomarlo como continuación es interesante.
par Martín B•
Sep 18, 2019
Should have much more real examples. Voting schemes was right, but mechanism design was completely abstract
par Mohammad Z•
Sep 09, 2018
poorly explained lectures. you're better off reading a textbook