Avis et commentaires pour l'étudiant pour Théorie des jeux II : applications avancées par Université de Stanford

This course could be better in many ways. However, I really appreciate the efforts the professors made to put up so much information into this short course. It opens many new worlds for me in the universe of game theory, and in particular, the Arrow's theorem is so astonishing that it almost refreshed my thinking on the mechanisms of voting.

The quality of the course is really high and I found it quite demanding, which is nice after the first course. It forces you to focus, review and think deeply about the meaning of the concepts. The exams are well-defined and they test properly the units. Some points aren't perfectly explained but that might be because the requirements for this course are quite high. Someone that is not used to mathematical notation would easily lose the track of the lessons. I hope that there'll be soon a Game Theory III.

Really enlightening class!

I now feel empowered to create project management processes that encourage truthfulness and participation of its different stakeholders in my everyday job.

I also found some very interesting parallels with the methodology of pricing and notably price elasticity, which is key when designing a new product or its associated business model.

PS: Although I understand the importance of it being mathematically formalized, I would have loved it to be sometimes more concrete (especially through exercises and quizzes).

Thank you so much,

Great course, I was really overdue but am hoping to get a certificate if possible

The lecture are useful and the lecturer clear in their content and delivery. However, it would be better if more practices with answers can be given, and the tutorial should include questions of greater difficulty, such as those with real game settings and rules to solve for optimum strategy.

A lot of the important results were covered but sometimes results came out of nowhere (for example with optimal auctions and virtual valuations).

Very nice

It is very challenging but also interesting

It was nice to have a second part with more specific subjects.

Overall, the course was good. Somehow, the concepts were not as clear as the basic game theory course. Definitely more advanced.

Great Course, same parts are challenging but i learned a lot about

it's better to give explanations of the quiz when it is passed.

Great course. Nice retracing of some notions of the course Game Theory like Pareto Oprimality. Nice idea doing some examples on auctions and voting systems. Nice proofs

Great course, but I think It could be more vivid like its predecessor

A good class with a good formal description and examples of game theoretic concepts.

Excellent skills obtained

Interesting, but not as good as part I. Some parts of the syllabus were not explained well enough: a lot of results just come out of thin air, and not a lot of intuitions are given.

The exams did not explain why the wrong answers are wrong. Even after you succeed a test, I expect an explanation of the questions, and the correct answers. Even if I have a correct answer to a question, I don't know if my reasoning is correct..

Interesting material, but sometimes hard to follow the lectures.

No es tan bueno como el primero. Sin embargo, tomarlo como continuación es interesante.

Should have much more real examples. Voting schemes was right, but mechanism design was completely abstract

poorly explained lectures. you're better off reading a textbook