Avis et commentaires pour d'étudiants pour Théorie des jeux II : applications avancées par Université de Stanford
À propos du cours
Meilleurs avis
LV
May 02, 2017
Very interesting! One missing thing: please write explanations for correct/incorrect questions in quizzes. In the basic course, I found them very helpful in understanding why my reasoning was wrong.
AS
Sep 11, 2016
Outstanding course on Game Theory. Provides excellent mathematical and logical treatment of the concepts and theory. A perfect stepping stone for researchers willing to pursue their research in Gam
51 - 75 sur 75 Avis pour Théorie des jeux II : applications avancées
par Blake C
•Dec 30, 2017
Great course
par 韩天煦
•Jan 08, 2018
excellent
par Venkatraman R
•Jun 16, 2017
very good
par Shiheng W
•Oct 25, 2016
Great
par Jin-wook L
•Jan 01, 2017
e
par ZHU S
•Jan 11, 2019
The lecture are useful and the lecturer clear in their content and delivery. However, it would be better if more practices with answers can be given, and the tutorial should include questions of greater difficulty, such as those with real game settings and rules to solve for optimum strategy.
par george v
•Feb 18, 2017
Great course. Nice retracing of some notions of the course Game Theory like Pareto Oprimality. Nice idea doing some examples on auctions and voting systems. Nice proofs
par Matthew W
•Nov 05, 2017
A lot of the important results were covered but sometimes results came out of nowhere (for example with optimal auctions and virtual valuations).
par R.Athindran
•Feb 23, 2017
Overall, the course was good. Somehow, the concepts were not as clear as the basic game theory course. Definitely more advanced.
par Ryan B
•Jul 06, 2017
A good class with a good formal description and examples of game theoretic concepts.
par Koa Y
•Jan 04, 2019
Great course, I was really overdue but am hoping to get a certificate if possible
par Affandi I
•Apr 13, 2017
Great course, but I think It could be more vivid like its predecessor
par Roland R
•Jan 10, 2018
Great Course, same parts are challenging but i learned a lot about
par Hushan J
•Oct 31, 2017
it's better to give explanations of the quiz when it is passed.
par Daniel A M S
•Jun 22, 2017
It was nice to have a second part with more specific subjects.
par Muhua X
•Sep 11, 2017
It is very challenging but also interesting
par carlo p
•Sep 02, 2019
Excellent skills obtained
par Mufizul I
•Jan 29, 2017
Very nice
par Cigdem K
•Oct 16, 2016
The exams did not explain why the wrong answers are wrong. Even after you succeed a test, I expect an explanation of the questions, and the correct answers. Even if I have a correct answer to a question, I don't know if my reasoning is correct..
par Telmo J P P
•Oct 18, 2017
Interesting, but not as good as part I. Some parts of the syllabus were not explained well enough: a lot of results just come out of thin air, and not a lot of intuitions are given.
par Martín B
•Sep 18, 2019
Should have much more real examples. Voting schemes was right, but mechanism design was completely abstract
par Carlos F S T
•Nov 15, 2017
No es tan bueno como el primero. Sin embargo, tomarlo como continuación es interesante.
par Jeppe v P
•Jun 08, 2017
Interesting material, but sometimes hard to follow the lectures.
par Mohammad Z
•Sep 09, 2018
poorly explained lectures. you're better off reading a textbook
