May 31, 2019
The assessments were excellent. Initially, I did have hesitation in getting started, but got hooked to the assessments. Thank you to Kavya and Steve, our Program Managers who encouraged us everyday.
Apr 23, 2019
complete view of the businesses related to each type, separated into different sections, but with a clear explanations that the different types are interlinked into a bigger picture
par Lewis D•
May 13, 2019
Some of the material and videos linked to as part of the course were not of a high 'academic' standard.
par BRYAN R P C•
Jul 10, 2020
El curso estuvo muy bueno, sin embargo deberían realizar ejercicios prácticos más que solo teoría.
par deepak k m•
Apr 22, 2020
outdated information and some links are not opening ,interaction should also be there
par Andrea G•
Sep 06, 2019
I like it but: some links are not working. too many reading and too little lesson.
par SYED D H N•
Apr 27, 2020
good course. would have been more attractive if material was presented in videos
par Pelin C I•
Jun 15, 2020
Level is much lower than expected. Teacher is not engaging. I do not recommend.
par Suresh R•
Feb 16, 2018
Lectures are good however would have enjoyed more with a better acce
par Dusan T•
Jul 19, 2020
It would be rated better if there was no annoying Module 4 test.
par Yash A•
Jul 23, 2018
Assignment 4 was not at all upto the mark.
par Tomas M•
Nov 16, 2017
Good base ground. Need fintech updates
par Daniel N•
Jan 24, 2020
Some links for reading didnt work
Sep 17, 2018
too much of text reading
par Jay K J•
May 03, 2020
par Maarten K•
Jul 19, 2020
Interesting contents, good introduction.
First two chapters are quite alright. Later modules have received less attention from the makers. The readings often consist of references to Wikipedia pages and magazine articles (which are missing some depth and sometimes require registration). I found that one video transcript resembled the Wikipedia page about that topic a lot...
Some video's stop before the lecturer has stopped speaking...
It doesn't seem like the course is being updated as there are a number of broken links (preventing of hindering you to pass assessments). Assessment questions could be better as there is too much room for interpretation.
A lot of participants have complained about the assessments in the discussion forums, but no reaction from moderators for years. If you want a certificate for this course, prepare to be frustrated!
par Christian L•
Nov 21, 2017
The content was okay, but there were several points, I did not like about the course. As a summary, much less professional than other courses.
1) There were many references to public sources like youtube or wikipedia - the reason for subscribing here is just to learn more than from these public sources.
2) In the video, there not much good visualisation to support the presentation (e.g. no or small graphics)
3) The editing of the videos is not always good, a couple of times, the video is just cut off in the end.
4) The Danish professor was not always easy to unterstand.
5) In the quizzes, it was not always clear how to answer (e.g. the answer consisted of three words which had to be given separated by comma, but there was no hint how to do it, so you had to try & error)
par Lily C•
Jul 17, 2020
I honestly didn't think this course was a great use of time. The readings are mostly links to wikipedia pages, and they don't connect particularly well to the videos. The quizzes and assessments also seem like broken tools. The answers seem arbitrary, sometimes aren't in the course material, and don't actually test your knowledge of the subject. The grading is very nit-picky and thus the quizzes are nearly impossible to pass. I'm convinced certain questions on the last exam (in Week 4) simply don't have a correct answer.
par Aldrin G S•
Jun 10, 2020
Course and topic is actually pretty interesting and is actually good for beginners which is a thumbs up. However, most links used came from wikipedia and many links provided are actually broken or redirects to the homepage of the website and not the article. Lastly, I would like to emphasize that the some questions on the final exam of module 4 will be answered purely based on luck or good guess because the readings and links are already broken hence would not be able to answer the question correctly.
par Karol S•
Nov 20, 2018
Some of the parts were not basic but kindergarten level. The lecturer is getting worse in speaking in english each course. The test are sometimes prepared wrong. When answering question the way it should be it sometimes shows mistake, even if it is not - simply the lecturer did not mentioned it in the video.
par Katja T•
Sep 09, 2019
Content and links partly not up to date. Little to no support from the mentors in the discussion forums. Had to wait quite some time to get my peer-to-peer review so that I could not finish the course on my on schedule which is frustrating as it is a monthly subscription.
par Siddharth B•
Jun 23, 2020
Lot of missing content. The video on Apple Pay is missing on Youtube. The reading content on the OpenBanking's impact on Customer Bank and Society is missing. It leads to a page not found error. Content is stale from 2018. Nothing new.
par Zivile M•
Jul 03, 2019
The presenter is very difficult to understand and the quizzes are absolutely rubbish: they are full of typos and poor grammar, and the questions and answers themselves are not well thought out at all.
par Vikram M•
Jan 24, 2020
Very high level information. Mostly refers to Wikipedia articles or magazine articles, that too outdated articles published 3-4 years back. Very little original course content.
par Francisco A•
Dec 26, 2019
Really poor. Explains extremmely basic concepts and abuse in the using of web URLs (lot of them were down). Don't recommend.
Nov 10, 2018
Course could have been more interactive and could have had more vidoes. It just hjad some links for self study
par WARISA M C•
Jun 27, 2020
Week 4 final assignment was rubbish. It doesn't allow people to pass though the answers were correct.