Avis et commentaires pour d'étudiants pour Cameras, Exposure, and Photography par Université d'État du Michigan
À propos du cours
Meilleurs avis
This course was very informative and provided just the right amount of challenge for me to stretch my creativity and newly obtained knowledge. I enjoyed it and I am looking forward to the next course.
It's a very good course for beginners and I got to learn a lot and improve my photography in every way possible! I recommend it to everyone who's interested in Photography and want to do more with it.
1201 - 1225 sur 1,262 Avis pour Cameras, Exposure, and Photography
par mario a
•Very complete course
par ZIA U
•It was great course
par Sakib N K
•Very well described
par Hemant K C
•Engaging instructor
par Omkar P
•Excellent course!
par Yashasvi S K
•Very good course
par Saketh A B
•Nice experience
par Ambar K
•Good basic Info
par Yan S
•系统性地对摄影这件事有个了解
par Mashuk-E-Elahi (
•Good course.
par Keyang Y
•Good course.
par Pratikshrivastav
•It was fun
par DHIVYA D B
•ணறளஞூபொவஷ
par Supantha R
•It was ok
par AKASH P
•very good
par Phanikumar R
•So good
par LOGAVARSHINI N
•Good
par Aka B M
•good
par Neha m
•Good
par Vaibhav V
•Good
par Barbara A
•This was an introductory course that went over the history of photography, the elements of the camera, how to use the camera in program mode, and how to creatively work with the frame among other topics. I found the course too cursory at times and there was not enough opportunity for practice and feedback before getting to the graded assignments. Some content seemed out of logical order. (e.g., Elements of a camera should have come before how to use the camera in program mode .) The quizzes and assignments had instructions that were often badly worded and confusing. e.g., Why were we graded on whether we titled our picture "frame" or "scene"? The last assignment rubric did not allow peer reviewers to select 0 points on the fifth rubric criterion. Overall learning was minor.
par Michael P
•The content is good; but the peer review process is a joke. Asked to review submissions that have nothing to do with the assignment. Several just random photos, even random Latin text inserted as statements. And some of the feedback is exactly what we are asked NOT to do. I.e, just say "I do not like it." Then give points, with no attempt to tie grading to assignment requirements.
Moreover, some of the grading options are not available. I.e. for the final assignment when it asks if author used one of the framing elements the only option is to answer yes.
Obviously, someone needs to update this course and do some quality control. I hope the remaining courses in the specialization are cleaner.
Again, content has been helpful; but the grading is a wreck.
par Peter B
•I'm not particularly impressed. The teachers are presenting the subject in the most boring way, standing in front of the camera and apparently reading from a teleprompter.
A lot of time is wasted on presentation, and presentation and presentation of the 2 teachers.
A large part seems to be - but I assume is not - hidden advertising for a couple of products.
It would have been useful to dig deeper in the actual subject matter, explain the handling and settings in more detail, and illustrating the lectures with more relevant examples.
Sullivan's video "Responding to photography" is simply a long list of things to consider with no evident supporting illustration.
It's a small 3*.
par Ida A
•The content of the course is good and I feel it would be beneficial for beginners or those who want to top up their technical / academic knowledge on the subject.
I found the terrible editing of the lectures distracting though, and it felt like no one bothered to over-see the final version that was published. I also don't think the fact that one has to pay so much to access the assessments, which many other courses don't do at all, is conducive to creating a strong engagement in the course. I wouldn't for example be encouraged to take another course from this series (not sure if one is offered).
par Ziping Z
•The first week and the final week are interesting.But in fact the week 2 & week 3 are kind of boring and those information could be easily acquired online, which I did not see the reason why I take this course for 2 weeks just study those knowledge.In contrast, the first and final week are focusing on how we gonna achieve a "good" image in a more dynamic way where we need more helps from tutors. If i could I would not recommend this course to a person who actually already had a habit of taking photos.
Coursera Footer
