Avis et commentaires pour d'étudiants pour Exploration analytique de données par Université Johns-Hopkins
À propos du cours
Meilleurs avis
Y
Sep 24, 2017
Very good course! It provide me the foundation in learning how to plot and interpret data. This will definitely strengthen my "R programming" to generate publication type figure for my genomics data!
CC
Jul 29, 2016
This is the second course I have taken from Roger Peng and both were outstanding. I have a strong math background, but not much of a background in stats, but this course was very approachable for me.
676 - 691 sur 691 Avis pour Exploration analytique de données
par Bartlomiej W
•Feb 06, 2016
Some parts of material is good quality, but some is bad - also some show bad practices in R. Extensively use swirl as assignments over self work. It is better to go through good tutorial over R base plotting system and ggplot2.
par David I
•Mar 26, 2016
The final project did not require use of the material in the course beyond the first week and a half. I did not take any quizzes or otherwise have my knowledge tested on the material in the second half of the course.
par Rohith J
•Dec 14, 2016
Course content and assignments were difficult to follow. Loads of statistical content along with high-level R content means it was probably the toughest of the 4 I have taken so far in the Coursetrack.
par Dmitry R
•Feb 06, 2016
some swirl tests (4,5) don't work because of parameter method in qplot function. This parameter is not realy existed in this function now
par Freddie K
•Apr 05, 2017
Quite repetitious in covering basic graphing, and very shallow in regards of clustering, SVD and PCA.
par Tamaz L
•Apr 05, 2016
Very unprofessional, compared to other courses. It wasn't well organized.
par Desmond W
•Oct 19, 2016
About plotting in R. Not about generating real insights from EDA.
par Esther L
•Aug 22, 2019
Too weak regarding the clustering methods, very disappointed.
par ewa b
•May 31, 2017
didnt get much useful-- a whole "course" on plotting? meh.
par Michal K
•May 10, 2016
too superficial
par Piyush V
•Jun 21, 2016
Veyr boring
par Josh H
•Nov 05, 2017
I can't help but feel lied to. The FAQ for the specialization says the following: "We also suggest a working knowledge of mathematics up to algebra (neither calculus or linear algebra are required). " If no linear algebra background is required, then why do you assume that I know what a singular value decomposition is? Or principal components analysis? Terrible course.
par Christy P
•Aug 25, 2017
How can you have a course on Graphic Devices and not show one screen shot of a graphic or open R to show how to perform the ideas around this topic?
par Nicholas
•Sep 30, 2016
NEEEEEED TO EDIT MY PEER REVIEW FROM OTHERS
par Carsten J
•Mar 01, 2016
Material is to basic for an entire course.
par omar k
•Oct 10, 2017
limited and monotonous explanation
