Avis et commentaires pour d'étudiants pour structures de données par Université de Californie à San Diego
À propos du cours
Meilleurs avis
PS
9 juil. 2020
I think the course content and assignments were great. A suggestion though, it will be more helpful if there are more and varied corner cases that would save time spent in thinking and making cases.
KL
4 sept. 2020
one of the best course i have ever taken on any platform.\n\ni love to learn on coursera platform.\n\ncoursera makes one to think fro solution.\n\nafter completion of course one feel satisfied.
776 - 800 sur 803 Avis pour structures de données
par MAVURI V S S
•21 janv. 2021
Good course
par Yu D
•20 mars 2020
too hard
par 321910302014 g
•19 nov. 2020
good
par HASAN N
•10 août 2020
good
par Abdulrahman A
•4 avr. 2017
none
par Mohit c
•16 oct. 2020
.
par Vivek N
•18 août 2016
Pros:
Effort has been taken in putting up the assignments.
Cons:
Quality of teaching is very poor and too fast to follow through . Instructors have rushed to present course material . I would not recommend this course . Princeton and Stanford offer much higher quality and presentation on the same topics.
par Jared P
•25 oct. 2016
Some of the assignments seemed overly complicated and irrelevant to the topics discussed. On a few occasions the videos would mention something but never discuss the reasoning. Once I posted to the forum and no one answered so I never asked about the other questions I found during the videos.
par Dhananjay S
•5 juil. 2020
The course is well designed and well taught too but, it has some limitations that the mentors and the faculties are not well interactive with the students as we as a student had to pass through various hardships to pass the programming assignment. The threads are not answered by mentors.
par Евгений С
•23 nov. 2020
I started this a couple of days ago and have been doing it hard as part of my specialization. I have only one quiz left and on November 23, a deadline suddenly came, despite the fact that I devoted a lot of time to the course and in fact completed it in two days. I have completely closed all 6 courses for specialization except for one quiz of 6 questions in week 4. Now someone has decided that the next set is only in half a year, seriously? All I need is to go through an automatic check of 6 questions without human control and get my cherished certificate. But it turns out that I wasted money? What is worth extending the course? I cannot wait that long and pay extra money. Could the moderators somehow influence this by informing people who can help?
par Noel
•23 mai 2017
The coursework for this course is not bad. But unfortunately, I was unable to find any help on questions on their discussion forum by the teaching assistants and professors monitoring the course. The course material was based on deriving and proving standard proofs versus trying to explain the underlying concept. I do not believe that this course was worth my money. All the knowledge I obtained in this course could have been obtaining from Data Structures and Algorithms by Micheal Goodrich and Roberto Tamasia. There were occasional references to stackoverflow among the course resources which I feel is not professional (though a good source of information).
par Nick
•15 mai 2017
Wow. I cannot express enough how terrible this specialization is. Only one of the professors speaks english! The lectures give trivial examples while the homework problems are unbelievably difficult. The starter files often times do not set us up to solve the problem in an optimal way. Homework problems cannot be solved when we are only give 1 hour of video lectures!
I will be taking my $$$ to edx.org
par Andrey S
•25 févr. 2018
For some assignments there is ONE tricky test that fails your solution and you are forced to blindly try to figure out this one tricky input(though your solution works for all of the tests you perform in addition to the one listed in the task). You end up spending lots of time trying to figure out this one test case instead of actually learning.
par Jonathan
•12 oct. 2016
Tree exercise had absolutely no relevant video material. Videos give zero context for why data structures are important or when they are used....Should take a lesson from the Stanford course.
par Niklas S
•1 févr. 2020
Extremely difficult for anyone without extensive programming background. Not much guidance available. Would be nice if there was something in between this and the first course in this module
par Supharerk T
•23 mai 2016
Worse than the first course. I expected something that is not academic-like explanation, which I can't find it here.
Please bring back those explanations style similar to the first course.
par Viraj D
•1 mai 2019
Lack of coding practice and didn't focus on the elaboration of Core Data structure. Better explanation will work.
par Pavan K H A
•28 mars 2022
I have completed my course but money asking to get certificate, please give me free certificate
par Sriparna C
•26 juin 2019
topics are not explained in detail and the program implementation is not taught
par Rohit V
•31 juil. 2020
i want to read in english for data structure for this courses at this time
par Ping R
•14 avr. 2021
Course 2 week 2 Parallel processing GRADING ERROR test case 2, PYTHON3
par Anh N
•30 sept. 2017
Terrible course, especially on the part of Dr. Kulikov. Terrible!!!
par Ahmed M
•6 juin 2020
very useful till the AVL trees
it became vague
par padakanti a
•22 mai 2020
its really tough for me to do the assements
par RAJ S
•19 sept. 2021
i want to leave this course
Coursera Footer
