Chevron Left
Retour à C++ For C Programmers, Part A

Avis et commentaires pour d'étudiants pour C++ For C Programmers, Part A par Université de Californie à Santa Cruz

4.4
étoiles
2,014 évaluations
570 avis

À propos du cours

This course is for experienced C programmers who want to program in C++. The examples and exercises require a basic understanding of algorithms and object-oriented software....

Meilleurs avis

CA
19 déc. 2019

I liked it, it costed me a little because I am not a C programmer with big experience, and this course I feel is focused on C programmers that want to know how to "translate" their code to C++

RH
16 oct. 2016

Just right for programmers seeking to update their skills to the new V11 C++. I recommend getting the book by the author that helps along with a text or Coursera course on Algorithms.

Filtrer par :

551 - 565 sur 565 Avis pour C++ For C Programmers, Part A

par Alperen S A

14 oct. 2020

this course contains great futures, but ... If you are a newbie, please don't enroll, professor usually covers only the surface of the subject, Nevertheless it is good course if you have passion for searching, reading stackoverflow etc.

par Paul C

19 mars 2020

Lectures slow and vague. The second homework is much much harder than the other two. Lots on graph theory but not too much C++

par Coppini D

14 déc. 2016

Peer to peer assignments are really slow and due time dependent.

par Varino A F

10 avr. 2021

I didn't like it so sorry for your efforts but it didn't fit me

par Bipul M

14 juin 2019

Worst programming language teaching style ever.

par maor k

13 août 2017

Explains very poorly ,Write unreadable

par Mohosina p m

29 juil. 2020

I want to unenroll this course

par ROBIN S

20 août 2020

more theory less practical

par Ivan L

14 avr. 2016

too hard in practice

par Anirudh s m

31 juil. 2020

NOT INTRESTED

par Denise T

20 mars 2016

Very Boring!!

par Thanh D D

4 déc. 2020

feel sleep

par TUSHAR S D

2 mai 2020

Unenrolled

par Deleted A

11 mai 2020

not good

par Mohamed M

31 mai 2020

BAD